Cited by 31Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The Euclidean three-point function in loop and perturbative gravity

Open access
Rovelli, Carlo, Zhang, Mingyi·2011·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We compute the leading order of the three-point function in loop quantum gravity, using the vertex expansion of the Euclidean version of the new spin foam dynamics, in the region of γ < 1. We find results consistent with Regge calculus in the limit γ → 0, j → ∞. We also compute the tree-level three-point function of perturbative quantum general relativity in position space and discuss the possibility of directly comparing the two results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/28/17/175010

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher-order correlation functions computed for the new models agree with Regge gravity in the γ → 0 limit.

    “Higher-order correlation functions have been computed in [337]; the results are in agreement with Regge gravity in the γ → 0 limit.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [337]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Laurent Freidel and Kirill Krasnov, "A New Spin Foam Model for 4d Gravity," Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 125018 (2008), arXiv:0708.1595. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Emanuele Alesci, Eugenio Bianchi, and Carlo Rovelli, "LQG propagator: III. The new vertex," Class. Quant. Grav., 26, 215001 (2009), arXiv:0812.5018. · DOI
  3. Eugenio Bianchi, Elena Magliaro, and Claudio Perini, "LQG propagator from the new spin foams," Nucl. Phys., B822, 245-269 (2009), arXiv:0905.4082. · DOI · Paper page
  4. John W. Barrett, Richard J. Dowdall, Winston J. Fair- bairn, Henrique Gomes, and Frank Hellmann, "Asymp- totic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude," J. Math. Phys., 50, 112504 (2009), arXiv:0902.1170. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Carlo Rovelli and Matteo Smerlak, "Spinfoams: sum- ming = refining," (2010), arXiv:1010.5437. · DOI
  6. Junichi Iwasaki and Carlo Rovelli, "Gravitons from loops: Nonperturbative loop space quantum gravity con- tains the graviton physics approximation," Class. Quant. Grav., 11, 1653-1676 (1994). · DOI
  7. Florian Conrady and Laurent Freidel, "Path integral rep- resentation of spin foam models of 4d gravity," Class. Quant. Grav., 25, 245010 (2008), arXiv:0806.4640. · DOI
  8. John W. Barrett, Richard J. Dowdall, Winston J. Fair- bairn, Henrique Gomes, and Frank Hellmann, "A Sum- mary of the asymptotic analysis for the EPRL ampli- tude," (2009), arXiv:0909.1882. · DOI
  9. Eugenio Bianchi, Elena Magliaro, and Claudio Perini, "Coherent spin-networks," Phys. Rev., D82, 024012 (2010), arXiv:0912.4054. · DOI
  10. "Saddle Point Method of Asymptotic Expansion," . · DOI
  11. John F. Donoghue, "General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections," Phys. Rev. D, 50, 3874-3888 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  12. R. Friedberg and T.D. Lee, "Derivation of Regge's action from Einstein's theory of general relativity," Nucl.Phys., B242, 145 (1984). · DOI
  13. G. Feinberg, R. Friedberg, T.D. Lee, and H.C. Ren, "Lattice gravity near the continuum limit," Nucl.Phys., B245, 343 (1984). · DOI
  14. Muxin Han and Carlo Rovelli, "Spinfoam Fermions: PCT Symmetry, Dirac Determinant, and Correlation Func- tions," (2011), arXiv:1101.3264. · DOI
  15. Winston J. Fairbairn and Catherine Meusburger, "Quan- tum deformation of two four-dimensional spin foam mod- els," (2010), arXiv:1012.4784. · DOI
  16. Private communication with Simone Speziale. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rovelli, C., & Zhang, M.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2011-08-12
Volume
28
Issue
17
Pages
175010
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2011281980
Cited by
31
References
57
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
three-point functions, loop quantum gravity, vertex expansion, Euclidean quantum gravity, Regge calculus, position space, tree-level Feynman diagrams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review