The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of photoelectric detection of light fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
The basic formulae governing the fluctuations of counts registered by photoelectric detectors in an optical field are derived. The treatment, which has its origin in Purcell's explanation of the Hanbury Brown-Twiss effect, is shown to apply to any quasi-monochromatic light, whether stationary or not, and whether of thermal origin or not. The representation of the classical wave amplitude, of the light by Gabor's complex analytic signal appears naturally in this treatment. It is shown that the correlation of counts registered by N separate photodetectors at N points in space is determined by a 2 N th order correlation function of the complex classical field. The variance of the individual counts is shown to be expressible as the sum of terms representing the effects of classical particles and classical waves, in analogy to a well-known result of Einstein relating to black-body radiation. Since the theory applies to correlation effects obtained with any type of light it applies, in particular, to the output of an optical maser, although, for a maser operating on one mode, correlation effects are likely to be very small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles of Optics: 60th Anniversary Edition
Born, M., & Wolf, E. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108769914 · Cited by 26,251
Self-citationComparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser
Jaynes, E. T., & Cummings, F. W. (1963) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1963.1664 · Cited by 5,353
The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.2529 · Cited by 4,077
Equivalence of Semiclassical and Quantum Mechanical Descriptions of Statistical Light Beams
Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1963) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.10.277 · Cited by 2,665
Self-citationCorrelation between Photons in two Coherent Beams of Light
BROWN, R. H., & TWISS, R. Q. (1956) · Nature · doi:10.1038/177027a0 · Cited by 2,573
Glauber, R. J. (1963) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.10.84 · Cited by 1,300
Coherence Properties of Optical Fields
MANDEL, L., & WOLF, E. (1965) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.37.231 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationFluctuations of Photon Beams: The Distribution of the Photo-Electrons
Mandel, L. (1959) · Proceedings of the Physical Society · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/74/3/301 · Cited by 476
Self-citationBrown, R. H., Twiss, R. Q., & surName, G. (1957) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1957.0177 · Cited by 423
van Cittert, P. H. (1934) · Physica · doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(34)90026-4 · Cited by 394
Cited by
Clauser, J. F. (1974) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.853 · Cited by 367
Kavokin, A. V., Baumberg, J. J., Malpuech, G., & Laussy, F. P. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198782995.001.0001 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandel, L., Sudarshan, E. C. G., & Wolf, E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Physical Society
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1964-09
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-444
- ISSN
- 0370-1328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995330836
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of photoelectric detection of light fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0370-1328/84/3/313
- The paper
- Mandel, L., Sudarshan, E. C. G., & Wolf, E. (1964). Theory of photoelectric detection of light fluctuations. Proceedings of the Physical Society. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/84/3/313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.