Cited by 367Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

Experimental distinction between the quantum and classical field-theoretic predictions for the photoelectric effect

Open access
Clauser, John F.·1974·Physical Review D

Abstract

We have measured various coincidence rates between four photomultiplier tubes viewing cascade photons on opposite sides of dielectric beam splitters. This experimental configuration, we show, is sensitive to differences between the classical and quantum field-theoretic predictions for the photoelectric effect. The results, to a high degree of statistical accuracy, contradict the predictions by any classical or semiclassical theory in which the probability of photoemission is proportional to the classical intensity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.9.853

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first successful generation of single photons was based on a cascade transition of calcium atoms.

    “The first successful generation of single photons (Clauser 1974) was based on a cascade transition of calcium atoms.”

    From Single-photon sources (2005) · cites this paper as Clauser 1974

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. A. Adam, L. Janossy, and P. Varga, Acta Phys. Hung. 4, 301 (1955); .... Ann. Physik 16,408 (1955). -
  2. J. M. Jauch, in FouIi.dationsof quantUm Mechanics, International School.of Physics "Enrico Fenni'.' , course 49, 1970, edited by B. d'Espagnat (Academic Press, N. Y. 1971) p.20; J. M. Jauch, Are Quanta Real (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind. 1973).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clauser, J. F.
Affiliations
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Clauser, John F.
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
1974-02-15
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
853-860
ISSN
0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074072681
Cited by
367
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
photoelectric effect, coincidence frequency, photomultiplier tubes, semiclassical theory, intensity dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review