The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO adsorption on close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces: trends from ab initio calculations
Open accessAbstract
We have studied the trends in CO adsorption on close-packed metal surfaces: Co, Ni, Cu from the 3d row, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag from the 4d row and Ir, Pt, Au from the 5d row using density functional theory. In particular, we were concerned with the trends in adsorption energy, geometry, vibrational properties and other parameters derived from the electronic structure of the substrate. The influence of specific changes in our set-up, such as choice of the exchange correlation functional, the choice of pseudopotential, size of the basis set and substrate relaxation, has been carefully evaluated. We found that, while the geometrical and vibrational properties of the adsorbate–substrate complex are calculated with high accuracy, the adsorption energies calculated with the gradient-corrected Perdew–Wang exchange–correlation energies are overestimated. In addition, the calculations tend to favour adsorption sites with higher coordination, resulting in the prediction of the wrong adsorption sites for the Rh, Pt and Cu surfaces (hollow instead of top). The revised Perdew–Burke–Erzernhof functional (RPBE) leads to lower (i.e. more realistic) adsorption energies for transition metals, but to the wrong results for noble metals—for Ag and Au, endothermic adsorption is predicted. The site preference remains the same. We discuss trends in relation to the electronic structure of the substrate across the periodic table, summarizing the state-of-the-art of CO adsorption on close-packed metal surfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
Towards the computational design of solid catalysts
Nørskov, J. K., Bligaard, T., Rossmeisl, J., & Christensen, C. H. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.121 · Cited by 4,161
Stamenkovic, V., Mun, B. S., Mayrhofer, K. J. J., Ross, P. N., Markovic, N. M., Rossmeisl, J., Greeley, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2006) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200504386 · Cited by 2,109
Electronic Structure Effects in Transition Metal Surface Chemistry
Vojvodic, A., Nørskov, J. K., & Abild-Pedersen, F. (2014) · Topics in Catalysis · doi:10.1007/s11244-013-0159-2 · Cited by 386
Hubbard U parameters for transition metals from first principles
Tesch, R., & Kowalski, P. M. (2022) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.195153 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Gajdo, M., Eichler, A., & Hafner, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-02-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1141-1164
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W1989986682
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO adsorption on close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces: trends from ab initio calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/16/8/001
- The paper
- Gajdo, M., Eichler, A., & Hafner, J. (2004). CO adsorption on close-packed transition and noble metal surfaces: trends from ab initio calculations. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/8/001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.