The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of size distribution on hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia
Open accessAbstract
For understanding hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles to be used for magnetic particle hyperthermia the effect of size distribution on the dependence of hysteresis losses on magnetic field amplitude is studied on the basis of a phenomenological model in the size range from superparamagnetism to magnetic multi-domains-roughly 10 up to 100 nm. Relying on experimental data for the size dependence of coercivity, an empirical expression for the dependence of hysteresis loss on field amplitude and particle size is derived for hypothetical monodisperse particle ensembles. Considering experimentally observable size distributions, the dependence of loss on distribution parameters-mean particle size and variance-is studied. There, field amplitude is taken into account as an important parameter, which for technical and biomedical reasons in hyperthermia equipment is restricted. Experimental results for different particle types with mean diameter of 30 nm may be well reproduced theoretically if a small loss contribution of Rayleigh type is taken into account. Results show that the Stoner-Wohlfarth model for single domain magnetization reversal via homogeneous rotation cannot explain experimental observations. In particular, in magnetosomes which are distinguished by nearly ideal crystallographic shapes and narrow size distribution large friction-like losses occur even for small field amplitude. Parameters of the high frequency field for hyperthermia (amplitude and frequency) as well as of the size distribution of applied particles are discussed with respect to attaining maximum specific heating power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Clinical applications of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia
Thiesen, B., & Jordan, A. (2008) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.1080/02656730802104757 · Cited by 829
Cited by
Mahmoudi, M., Sant, S., Wang, B., Laurent, S., & Sen, T. (2011) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.05.006 · Cited by 1,881
Magnetic fluid hyperthermia: focus on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
Laurent, S., Dutz, S., Häfeli, U. O., & Mahmoudi, M. (2011) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2011.04.003 · Cited by 1,326
Self-citationFundamentals and advances in magnetic hyperthermia
Périgo, E. A., Hemery, G., Sandre, O., Ortega, D., Garaio, E., Plazaola, F., & Teran, F. J. (2015) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.4935688 · Cited by 836
Comprehensive understanding of magnetic hyperthermia for improving antitumor therapeutic efficacy
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, W., Li, G., Ma, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Tiwari, S., Shi, K., et al. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.40805 · Cited by 719
Dutz, S., & Hergt, R. (2013) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.822993 · Cited by 522
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hergt, R., Dutz, S., & Röder, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-08-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 385214
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W2160137022
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of size distribution on hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/20/38/385214
- The paper
- Hergt, R., Dutz, S., & Röder, M. (2008). Effects of size distribution on hysteresis losses of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/38/385214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.