The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In this review, the use of x-ray computed tomography (XCT) is examined, identifying the requirement for volumetric dimensional measurements in industrial verification of additively manufactured (AM) parts. The XCT technology and AM processes are summarised, and their historical use is documented. The use of XCT and AM as tools for medical reverse engineering is discussed, and the transition of XCT from a tool used solely for imaging to a vital metrological instrument is documented. The current states of the combined technologies are then examined in detail, separated into porosity measurements and general dimensional measurements. In the conclusions of this review, the limitation of resolution on improvement of porosity measurements and the lack of research regarding the measurement of surface texture are identified as the primary barriers to ongoing adoption of XCT in AM. The limitations of both AM and XCT regarding slow speeds and high costs, when compared to other manufacturing and measurement techniques, are also noted as general barriers to continued adoption of XCT and AM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 · Cited by 3,299
The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals
Evans, A. G., Hutchinson, J. W., Fleck, N. A., Ashby, M. F., & Wadley, H. N. G. (2001) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6425(00)00016-5 · Cited by 1,134
Li, Y., Yang, W., Li, X., Zhang, X., Wang, C., Meng, X., Pei, Y., Fan, X., Lan, P., Wang, C., et al. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b00331 · Cited by 210
Cited by
du Plessis, A., Yadroitsev, I., Yadroitsava, I., & Le Roux, S. G. (2018) · 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1089/3dp.2018.0060 · Cited by 550
Application of Directed Energy Deposition-Based Additive Manufacturing in Repair
Saboori, A., Aversa, A., Marchese, G., Biamino, S., Lombardi, M., & Fino, P. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9163316 · Cited by 537
Honarvar, F., & Varvani-Farahani, A. (2020) · Ultrasonics · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227 · Cited by 489
Seifi, M., Gorelik, M., Waller, J., Hrabe, N., Shamsaei, N., Daniewicz, S., & Lewandowski, J. J. (2017) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 · Cited by 422
Pegues, J. W., Shao, S., Shamsaei, N., Sanaei, N., Fatemi, A., Warner, D. H., Li, P., & Phan, N. (2020) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, A., Maskery, I., & Leach, R. K.
- Venue
- Measurement Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-06-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 072001
- ISSN
- 0957-0233 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2412321691
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001
- The paper
- Thompson, A., Maskery, I., & Leach, R. K. (2016). X-ray computed tomography for additive manufacturing: a review. Measurement Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/7/072001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
