The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Graphene nanocomposite for biomedical applications: fabrication, antimicrobial and cytotoxic investigations
Open accessAbstract
Materials possessing excellent bacterial toxicity, while presenting low cytotoxicity to human cells, are strong candidates for biomaterials applications. In this study, we present the fabrication of a nanocomposite containing poly(N-vinylcarbazole) (PVK) and graphene (G) in solutions and thin films. Highly dispersed PVK-G (97-3 w/w%) solutions in various organic and aqueous solvents were prepared by solution mixing and sonication methods. The thermal properties and morphology of the new composite were analyzed using thermal gravimetry analysis (TGA) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), respectively. PVK-G films were immobilized onto indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates via electrodeposition. AFM was used to characterize the resulting topography of the nanocomposite thin films, while cyclic voltammetry and UV-vis were used to monitor their successful electrodeposition. The antimicrobial properties of the electrodeposited PVK-G films and solution-based PVK-G were investigated against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis). Microbial growth after exposure to the nanocomposite, metabolic assay and live-dead assay of the bacterial solutions exposed to PVK-G presented fewer viable and active bacteria than those exposed to pure PVK or pure graphene solutions. The PVK-G film inhibited about 80% of biofilm surface coverage whereas the PVK- and G-modified surfaces allowed biofilm formation over almost the whole coated surface (i.e. > 80%). The biocompatibility of the prepared PVK-G solutions on NIH 3T3 cells was evaluated using the MTS cell proliferation assay. A 24 h exposure of the PVK-G nanocomposite to the NIH 3T3 cells presented ~80% cell survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanotoxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Seabra, A. B., Paula, A. J., de Lima, R., Alves, O. L., & Durán, N. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx400385x · Cited by 893
Role and Potential of Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion
Baek, G., Kim, J., Kim, J., & Lee, C. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11010107 · Cited by 341
Das, B., Mandal, M., Upadhyay, A., Chattopadhyay, P., & Karak, N. (2013) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/035003 · Cited by 122
Morphology, Crystallinity, and Molecular Weight of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Graphene Oxide Hybrids
Castilla-Cortázar, I., Vidaurre, A., Marí, B., & Campillo-Fernández, A. J. (2019) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym11071099 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, C. M., Mangadlao, J., Ahmed, F., Leon, A., Advincula, R. C., & Rodrigues, D. F.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-09-07
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 395101
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2082622293
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphene nanocomposite for biomedical applications: fabrication, antimicrobial and cytotoxic investigations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-4484/23/39/395101
- The paper
- Santos, C. M., Mangadlao, J., Ahmed, F., Leon, A., Advincula, R. C., & Rodrigues, D. F. (2012). Graphene nanocomposite for biomedical applications: fabrication, antimicrobial and cytotoxic investigations. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/39/395101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.