The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time variation of ammonia, acetone, isoprene and ethanol in breath: a quantitative SIFT-MS study over 30 days
Open accessAbstract
A study of the concentrations of the common breath metabolites ammonia, acetone, isoprene, ethanol and acetaldehyde in the breath of five subjects over a period of 30 days has been carried out. Breath samples were taken and analysed in the early morning on arrival at the laboratory. The real time analyses of three consecutive breath exhalations were carried out using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) on line to the instrument. Sufficient data were obtained to allow meaningful concentration distributions to be obtained for ammonia, acetone, isoprene and ethanol. These showed that the ammonia, acetone and isoprene concentrations exhibited sensibly normal distributions, with coefficients of variation of typically 0.3. Obvious and statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences are apparent in the mean concentrations of these metabolites between the five individuals. The acetaldehyde concentrations were relatively low and close to the instrument detection limit, and the differences between the mean concentrations of the five subjects were not statistically significant (p = 0.4), so distributions were not obtained. The mean concentrations, in parts per billion (ppb), of each metabolite range amongst the five subjects are as follows: ammonia, 422-2389: acetone, 293-870; isoprene, 55-121; ethanol, 27-153; acetaldehyde, 2-5. There are no obvious patterns in the distributions of these particular metabolites for these individuals, except that the ammonia levels were greatest in the breath of the two oldest subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of ammonia on the breath of patients in end-stage renal failure
Davies, S., Spanel, P., & Smith, D. (1997) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1997.324 · Cited by 406
Self-citation
Cited by
Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT‐MS) for on‐line trace gas analysis
Smith, D., & Španěl, P. (2005) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20033 · Cited by 801
Self-citationRighettoni, M., Tricoli, A., & Pratsinis, S. E. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac902695n · Cited by 630
Review—Non-Invasive Monitoring of Human Health by Exhaled Breath Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
Das, S., & Pal, M. (2020) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab67a6 · Cited by 466
Shin, J., Choi, S., Lee, I., Youn, D., Park, C. O., Lee, J., Tuller, H. L., & Kim, I. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201202729 · Cited by 391
Turner, C., Španěl, P., & Smith, D. (2006) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/27/4/001 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Diskin, A. M., pan l, P., & Smith, D.
- Venue
- Physiological Measurement
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-01-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-119
- ISSN
- 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965904339
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time variation of ammonia, acetone, isoprene and ethanol in breath: a quantitative SIFT-MS study over 30 days. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0967-3334/24/1/308
- The paper
- Diskin, A. M., pan l, P., & Smith, D. (2003). Time variation of ammonia, acetone, isoprene and ethanol in breath: a quantitative SIFT-MS study over 30 days. Physiological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/24/1/308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.