The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry
Open accessAbstract
Particle image velocimetry (PIV) has become the chief experimental technique for velocity field measurements in fluid flows. The technique yields quantitative visualizations of the instantaneous flow patterns, which are typically used to support the development of phenomenological models for complex flows or for validation of numerical simulations. However, due to the complex relationship between measurement errors and experimental parameters, the quantification of the PIV uncertainty is far from being a trivial task and has often relied upon subjective considerations. Recognizing the importance of methodologies for the objective and reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) of experimental data, several PIV-UQ approaches have been proposed in recent years that aim at the determination of objective uncertainty bounds in PIV measurements. This topical review on PIV uncertainty quantification aims to provide the reader with an overview of error sources in PIV measurements and to inform them of the most up-to-date approaches for PIV uncertainty quantification and propagation. The paper first introduces the general definitions and classifications of measurement errors and uncertainties, following the guidelines of the International Organization for Standards (ISO) and of renowned books on the topic. Details on the main PIV error sources are given, considering the entire measurement chain from timing and synchronization of the data acquisition system, to illumination, mechanical properties of the tracer particles, imaging of those, analysis of the particle motion, data validation and reduction. The focus is on planar PIV experiments for the measurement of two- or three-component velocity fields. Approaches for the quantification of the uncertainty of PIV data are discussed. Those are divided into a-priori UQ approaches, which provide a general figure for the uncertainty of PIV measurements, and a-posteriori UQ approaches, which are data-based and aim at quantifying the uncertainty of specific sets of data. The findings of a-priori PIV-UQ based on theoretical modelling of the measurement chain as well as on numerical or experimental assessments are discussed. The most up-to-date approaches for a-posteriori PIV-UQ are introduced, highlighting their capabilities and limitations. As many PIV experiments aim at determining flow properties derived from the velocity fields (e.g. vorticity, time-average velocity, Reynolds stresses, pressure), the topic of PIV uncertainty propagation is tackled considering the recent investigations based on Taylor series and Monte Carlo methods. Finally, the uncertainty quantification of 3D velocity measurements by volumetric approaches (tomographic PIV and Lagrangian particle tracking) is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Describing the uncertainties in experimental results
Moffat, R. J. (1988) · Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science · doi:10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-x · Cited by 9,860
(1953) · Mechanical Engineering · Cited by 6,608
Random Data-Analysis and Measurement Procedures
Bendat, J. S., Piersol, A. G., & Saunders, H. (1989) · Journal of Vibration and Acoustics · doi:10.1115/1.3269865 · Cited by 6,375
Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide
Raffel, M., Willert, C. E., Scarano, F., Kähler, C. J., Wereley, S. T., & Kompenhans, J. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68852-7 · Cited by 5,049
Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics
Adrian, R. J. (1991) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401 · Cited by 3,405 · cited 1×
“The theory confirms the results of previous Monte Carlo simulations (Adrian 1991, Willert 1996) that the minimum error occurs for dτ = 2 pixels, and that larger particle image diameters yield increased random errors (figure 5).”
ResultDigital particle image velocimetry
Willert, C. E., & Gharib, M. (1991) · Experiments in Fluids · doi:10.1007/bf00190388 · Cited by 1,991
Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry
Westerweel, J. (1997) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/002 · Cited by 1,425
Twenty years of particle image velocimetry
Adrian, R. J. (2005) · Experiments in Fluids · doi:10.1007/s00348-005-0991-7 · Cited by 1,267
Tomographic particle image velocimetry
Elsinga, G. E., Scarano, F., Wieneke, B., & van Oudheusden, B. W. (2006) · Experiments in Fluids · doi:10.1007/s00348-006-0212-z · Cited by 1,251
Metadata
- Authors
- Sciacchitano, A.
- Venue
- Measurement Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 092001
- ISSN
- 0957-0233 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2943030959
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1361-6501/ab1db8
- The paper
- Sciacchitano, A. (2019). Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry. Measurement Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab1db8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.