Cited by 29Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsMagnetic confinement fusion research

Particle modeling of radial electron dynamics in a controlled discharge of a Hall thruster

Open access
Domínguez-Vázquez, A, Taccogna, F, Ahedo, E·2018·Plasma Sources Science and Technology

Abstract

An improved radial particle-in-cell model of an annular Hall effect thruster discharge with secondary-electron emission from the walls and a radial magnetic field is presented. New algorithms are implemented: first, to adjust the mean neutral density to the desired mean plasma density; second, to avoid the refreshing of axially accelerated particles; and third, to correctly weigh low-density populations (such as secondary electrons). The high-energy tails of the velocity distribution functions of primary and secondary electrons from each wall are largely depleted, leading to temperature anisotropies for each species. The secondary-electron populations are found to be partially recollected by the walls and partially transferred to the primary population. The replenishment ratio of the primary high-energy tail is determined based on the sheath potential fall. Significant asymmetries at the inner and outer walls are found for the collected currents, the mean impact energy, and the wall and sheath potentials. Radial profiles in the plasma bulk are asymmetric too, due to a combination of the geometric expansion, the magnetic mirror effect, and the centrifugal force (emanating from the E × B drift). The temperature anisotropy and non-uniformity, and the centrifugal force modify the classical Boltzmann relation on electrons along the magnetic lines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6595/aac968

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different DSMC models show the effect of flow misalignment and thermal accommodation coefficient α_W on the intake performance.

    “The latter has been investigated by different DSMC models 223,224 that show the effect of flow misalignment and thermal accommodation coefficient α W on the intake performance.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [224]

    The Introduction describes PIC/MCC models of Hall-thruster electron dynamics, not DSMC models of an intake. Searches for flow misalignment, thermal accommodation coefficient α_W, and intake performance found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim; the available passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chemical reactions and recombination of atomic oxygen into O2 molecules on the wall are important to model the variation of the gas composition throughout the intake.

    “The importance of chemical reactions and recombination of atomic oxygen into O 2 molecules on the wall has also been highlighted in order to model the variation of the gas composition throughout the intake 224 .”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [224]

    The plasma-wall interaction passage (page unavailable) discusses ion recombination in a Hall thruster and says it is not modeled explicitly. A search for atomic oxygen recombination, O2 formation, chemical reactions, and intake gas composition found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Ahedo E 2011 Plasmas for space propulsion Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 124037 · DOI
  2. Goebel D M and Katz I 2008 Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters (New York: Wiley)
  3. Jahn R G 1968 Physics of Electric Propulsion (New York: McGraw-Hill) (reprinted by Dover)
  4. Barral S, Peradzynski Z, Makowski K and Dudeck M 2003 An alternative theory of transit-time oscillations in Hall thrusters Proc. 28th Int. Electric Propulsion Conf., Toulouse, France paper IEPC 03-335, Electric Rocket Propulsion Society, https://erps.spacegrant.org
  5. Ahedo E and Parra F I 2002 Model of radial plasma-wall interactions in a Hall thruster Proc. 38th Joint Propulsion Conf., Indianapolis, IN, Paper AIAA 2002-4106, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, https://www.aiaa.org/
  6. Ahedo E, Gallardo J M and Martínez-Sánchez M 2003 Effects of the radial-plasma wall interaction on the axial Hall thruster discharge Phys. Plasmas 10 3397-409 · DOI
  7. Ahedo E and Parra F I 2005 Partial trapping of secondary electron emission in a Hall thruster plasma Phys. Plasmas 12 073503 · DOI
  8. Ahedo E and de Pablo V 2007 Combined effects of electron partial thermalization and secondary emission in Hall thruster discharges Phys. Plasmas 14 083501 · DOI
  9. Sydorenko D, Smolyakov A, Kaganovich I and Raitses Y 2006 Modification of electron velocity distribution in bounded plasmas by secondary electron emission IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 815-24 · DOI
  10. Wang H, Campanell M, Kaganovich I and Cai G 2014 Effect of asymmetric secondary emission in bounded low- collisional E×B plasma on sheath and plasma properties J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47 405204 · DOI
  11. Taccogna F, Longo S, Capitelli M and Schneider R 2007 Particle-in-cell simulation of stationary plasma thruster Contrib. Plasma Phys. 47 635-56 · DOI
  12. Taccogna F, Schneider R, Longo S and Capitelli M 2008 Kinetic simulations of a plasma thruster Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 17 024003 · DOI
  13. Furman M A and Pivi M T F 2002 Probabilistic model for the simulation of secondary electron emission Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 5 124404 · DOI
  14. Nanbu K 2000 Simple method to determine collisional event in Monte Carlo simulation of electron-molecule collision Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33 4752-3 · DOI
  15. Surendra M, Graves D B and Morey I J 1990 Electron heating in low-pressure RF glow discharges Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 1022-4 · DOI
  16. Nanbu K 1997 Theory of cumulative small-angle collisions in plasmas Phys. Rev. E 55 4642-52 · DOI
  17. Nanbu K and Yonemura S 1998 Weighted particles in Coulomb collision simulations based on the theory of a cumulative scattering angle J. Comput. Phys. 145 639-54 · DOI
  18. Bobylev A V and Nanbu K 2000 Theory of collision algorithms for gases and plasmas based on the Boltzmann equation and the Landau-Fokker-Plack equation Phys. Rev. E 61 4576-86 · DOI
  19. Wang C, Lin T, Caflisch R, Cohen B I and Dimits A M 2008 Particle simulation of Coulomb collisions: comparing the methods of Takizuka & Abe and Nanbu J. Comput. Phys. 227 4308-29 · DOI
  20. Verboncoeur J P 2001 Symmetric spline weighting for charge and current density in particle simulation J. Comput. Phys. 174 421-7 · DOI
  21. Ahedo E, Santos R and Parra F I 2010 Fulfillment of the kinetic Bohm criterion in a quasineutral particle-in-cell model Phys. Plasmas 17 073507 · DOI
  22. Press W H, Teukolsky S A, Vetterling W T and Flannery B P 2001 Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing (New York: Cambridge University Press) Available online: http://numerical.recipes/
  23. Szabo J J Jr. 2001 Fully kinetic numerical modeling of a plasma thruster PhD Thesis (Cambridge, MA: Massachuchusetts Institute of Technology)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domínguez-Vázquez, A., Taccogna, F., & Ahedo, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Istituto di Nanotecnologia (IT)
Venue
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
064006
ISSN
  • 0963-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6595
OpenAlex
W2806220048
Cited by
29
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plasma Sources Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (PON03PE 00067 6)
  • Spain´s National Research and Development Plan (ESP2016-75887)
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, (730135)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
Hall thruster, secondary electron emission, radial magnetic field, electron temperature anisotropy, sheath potential, magnetic mirror effect, centrifugal force, E×B drift, plasma density control, Boltzmann relation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review