Cited by 9Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsVacuum and Plasma ArcsGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breathing modes in HEMP thrusters

Open access

Abstract

HEMP thrusters develop breathing mode oscillations with frequencies in the 100 kHz range during stable operation in test facilities. The mechanism of those oscillations in the HEMP-T DM3a model, developed by Thales Deutschland GmbH, is investigated using a fully kinetic PIC-MCC simulation model. The formation and time evolution of a breathing mode are discussed. The consequences for stable thruster operation are outlined and the oscillation frequency is compared to a 0D predator–prey oscillation frequency estimate. A comparison with an experimental discharge current measurement of a breathing mode is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6595/aaf29a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ECCOPIC code was verified in an international Hall thruster-related benchmark involving several codes and validated with experimental data, demonstrating the method's functionality.

    “The ECCOPICcode employed in Refs. 119, 142, 143, and 331 was verified in an international HT-related benchmark involving several codes 84 and validated with experimental data 119,331 , demonstrating the method's functionality.”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Simulation results section compares the simulation with HEMP-thruster measurements and reports that it reproduces an optical breathing feature observed experimentally. But the Conclusions and outlook section says the simulated breathing frequency and amplitude differ substantially from measurements. Our copy does not identify the code as ECCOPIC or document its participation in an international multi-code benchmark; the citing sentence attaches a separate reference to the benchmark. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The LANDMARK project benchmarks, reproduced by seven research groups, allowed comparative evaluation of PIC algorithms and showed capability to capture time evolution of MTSI and ECDI with minimal difference.

    “These benchmarks, reproduced by seven research groups worldwide, also allowed a comparative evaluation to examine the efficiency of the implementation of PIC algorithms (type of parallelization, Poisson's solvers, explicit vs implicit algorithms, CPU compared to GPU architectures, etc. 84,99 ). Fig. 4 illustrates a comparison of the twodimensional radial-azimuthal simulation results implemented by”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Simulation model and Conclusions and outlook sections describe one PIC-MCC simulation of breathing modes in a HEMP thruster, not a multi-group benchmark. Searches for LANDMARK, seven research groups, MTSI, and ECDI found no passage addressing the attributed comparison of PIC algorithms or the claimed agreement in time evolution. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Choueiri, 2001, Phys. Plasmas, 8, 1411, 10.1063/1.1354644 · DOI
  2. Gascon, 2003, Phys. Plasmas, 10, 4123, 10.1063/1.1611880 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sekerak, 2016, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 32, 903, 10.2514/1.B35709 · DOI
  4. Romadanov, 2018, Phys. Plasmas, 25, 10.1063/1.5020749 · DOI
  5. Boeuf, 1998, J. Appl. Phys., 84, 3541, 10.1063/1.368529 · DOI
  6. Yamamoto, 2005, J. Propul. Power, 21, 870, 10.2514/1.12759 · DOI
  7. Barral, 2006, Theoretical study of the breathing mode in Hall thrusters, 10.2514/6.2006-5172 · DOI
  8. Barral, 2009, Phys. Rev. E, 79, 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.046401 · DOI
  9. Barral, 2010, Phys. Plasmas, 17, 10.1063/1.3292645 · DOI
  10. Hara, 2014, Phys. Plasmas, 21, 10.1063/1.4903843 · DOI
  11. Hara, 2014, J. Appl. Phys., 115, 10.1063/1.4879896 · DOI
  12. Takizuka, 1977, J. Comput. Phys., 25, 205, 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90099-7 · DOI
  13. Bronold, 2007, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 40, 6583, 10.1088/0022-3727/40/21/018 · DOI
  14. Kalentev, 2014, Contrib. Plasma Phys., 54, 235, 10.1002/ctpp.201300038 · DOI
  15. Matyash, 2010, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 38, 2274, 10.1109/TPS.2010.2056936 · DOI
  16. Battista, 2007, A review of the Hall thruster scaling methodology
  17. Fubiani, 2017, New J. Phys., 19, 10.1088/1367-2630/19/1/015002 · DOI
  18. Goebel, 2008, vol 1, 10.1002/9780470436448 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Vial, 2005, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 33, 524, 10.1109/TPS.2005.845363 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kahnfeld, D., Heidemann, R., Duras, J., Matthias, P., Bandelow, G., Lüskow, K., Kemnitz, S., Matyash, K., & Schneider, R.
Affiliations
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
  • Thales (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Kahnfeld, D
Venue
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
124002
ISSN
  • 0963-0252 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6595
OpenAlex
W2901153642
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Plasma Sources Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (50RS1510)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Keywords
breathing mode oscillations, predator-prey oscillations, discharge current

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review