Cited by 49Quantum many-body systemsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesStatistical Mechanics and Entropy

Exact quantum decay of an interacting many-particle system: the Calogero–Sutherland model

Open access
Campo, Adolfo del·2016·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

The exact quantum decay of a one-dimensional Bose gas with inverse-square interactions is presented. The system is equivalent to a gas of particles obeying generalized exclusion statistics. We consider the expansion dynamics of a cloud initially confined in a harmonic trap that is suddenly switched off. The decay is characterized by analyzing the fidelity between the initial and the time-evolving states, also known as the survival probability. It exhibits early on a quadratic dependence on time that turns into a power-law decay, during the course of the evolution. It is shown that the particle number and the strength of interactions determine the power-law exponent in the latter regime, as recently conjectured. The nonexponential character of the decay is linked to the many-particle reconstruction of the initial state from the decaying products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/015014

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gogolin C and Eisert J 2015 in preparation (arXiv:1503.07538) · arXiv
  2. Kim S and Brand J 2011 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44 195301 · DOI
  3. del Campo A 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 031606(R) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campo, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Campo, Adolfo del
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
015014
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124058778
Cited by
49
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
University of Massachusetts (P20150000029279)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
Keywords
Calogero-Sutherland model, inverse-square interaction, quantum decay, survival probability, fidelity, one-dimensional Bose gas, power-law decay, non-exponential decay, exact solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review