The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication
Open accessAbstract
We construct a connected network of 3.9 million nodes from mobile phone call records, which can be regarded as a proxy for the underlying human communication network at the societal level. We assign two weights on each edge to reflect the strength of social interaction, which are the aggregate call duration and the cumulative number of calls placed between the individuals over a period of 18 weeks. We present a detailed analysis of this weighted network by examining its degree, strength, and weight distributions, as well as its topological assortativity and weighted assortativity, clustering and weighted clustering, together with correlations between these quantities. We give an account of motif intensity and coherence distributions and compare them to a randomized reference system. We also use the concept of link overlap to measure the number of common neighbours any two adjacent nodes have, which serves as a useful local measure for identifying the interconnectedness of communities. We report a positive correlation between the overlap and weight of a link, thus providing strong quantitative evidence for the weak ties hypothesis, a central concept in social network analysis. The percolation properties of the network are found to depend on the type and order of removed links, and they can help understand how the local structure of the network manifests itself at the global level. We hope that our results will contribute to modelling weighted large-scale social networks, and believe that the systematic approach followed here can be adopted to study other weighted networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
On Information and Sufficiency
Kullback, S., & Leibler, R. A. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · Cited by 20,193
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Community structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Self-citationNetwork motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D., & Alon, U. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 · Cited by 7,368
Epidemic Spreading in Scale-Free Networks
Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.3200 · Cited by 5,731
Assortative Mixing in Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.208701 · Cited by 4,988
Cited by
Torous, J., Kiang, M. V., Lorme, J., & Onnela, J.-P. (2016) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.5165 · Cited by 758
“Mobile phone data, in the format of anonymized call detail records obtained directly from phone operators, have now been used for about a decade to study social and communication networks, communication dynamics, spatial mobility, and more [24-29].”
Self-citationClustering in complex directed networks
Fagiolo, G. (2007) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.76.026107 · Cited by 802
Small but slow world: How network topology and burstiness slow down spreading
Karsai, M., Kivelä, M., Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., Barabási, A.-L., & Saramäki, J. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.025102 · Cited by 668
Self-citationUncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records
Candia, J., González, M. C., Wang, P., Schoenharl, T., Madey, G., & Barabási, A.-L. (2008) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/22/224015 · Cited by 477
Self-citationGeographical dispersal of mobile communication networks
Lambiotte, R., Blondel, V. D., de Kerchove, C., Huens, E., Prieur, C., Smoreda, Z., & Van Dooren, P. (2008) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2008.05.014 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Menezes, M. A. D., Kaski, K., Barabási, A.-L., & Kertész, J.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-06-28
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 179-179
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105585871
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 14.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/179
- The paper
- Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Menezes, M. A. D., Kaski, K., Barabási, A.-L., & Kertész, J. (2007). Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/6/179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.