The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming erasure errors with multilevel systems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first experimental demonstrations of verifiable blind quantum computing were performed using polarization qubits represented by multi-photon states generated via parametric down-conversion.
“We have shortly described in Section 2.2.2 the first experimental demonstrations of verifiable blind quantum computing, performed using polarization qubits represented by multi-photon states generated via parametric down-conversion [437,444,455,456]”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [444]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication
Briegel, H.-J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.5932 · Cited by 3,481
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Cleve, R., Gottesman, D., & Lo, H.-K. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.648 · Cited by 1,373
Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices
Knill, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03350 · Cited by 1,184
Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate
Aharonov, D., & Ben-Or, M. (2008) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539799359385 · Cited by 513
Codes for the quantum erasure channel
Grassl, M., Beth, T., & Pellizzari, T. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.56.33 · Cited by 374
Capacities of Quantum Erasure Channels
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., & Smolin, J. A. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3217 · Cited by 365
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1098/rspa.1998.0167 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.127901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5385 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052318 · DOI
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127902 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms4658 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep20463 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.032325 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.032335 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00340-015-6314-7 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.012304 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.180503 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2012.243 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.210501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052304 · DOI
- Glaudell A N, 2016, New J. Phys., 18, 10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093008 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.200502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022317 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.217901 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250501 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0800740105 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep05364 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.100501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042322 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-0779(98)00218-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.030301 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13188 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1237125 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4916903 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.230502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.032331 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.240401 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.140502 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.288.5473.2024 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.110506 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012311 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.150802 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.150801 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.080801 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-306-47097-7_45 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Metadata
- Authors
- Muralidharan, S., Zou, C.-L., Li, L., Wen, J., & Jiang, L.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-01-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 013026
- ISSN
- 1367-2630
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 7
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (EFMA-1640959)
- Army Research Office MURI (FA9550-14-1-0052, FA9550-15-1-0015)
- Army Research Laboratory (CDQI)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0011, W911NF-14-1-0563)
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- NBRPC
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0052, FA9550-15-1-0015)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
