The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiport photonic interferometers are good candidates for implementing quantum simulators or even general-purpose quantum computers.
“This feature has suggested multiport photonic interferometers as good candidates for the implementation of quantum simulators or even general-purpose quantum computers [586,591,592]”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [591]
In 2015, Huh et al. found the first application of BosonSampling for quantum simulation to evaluate molecular vibronic spectra.
“Within this framework, in 2015 Huh et al. found the first application of BosonSampling for quantum simulation to evaluate molecular vibronic spectra [586,591,592].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [591]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition
Nielsen, M. A., & Chuang, I. L. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 · Cited by 8,436
The complexity of computing the permanent
Valiant, L. G. (1979) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(79)90044-6 · Cited by 2,705
Carolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., Shadbolt, P. J., Matsuda, N., Oguma, M., Itoh, M., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3642 · Cited by 1,093
Integrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling
Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Ramponi, R., Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Maiorino, E., Mataloni, P., & Sciarrino, F. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.112 · Cited by 662
Self-citationPhotonic Boson Sampling in a Tunable Circuit
Broome, M. A., Fedrizzi, A., Rahimi-Keshari, S., Dove, J., Aaronson, S., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231440 · Cited by 634
Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling
Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Bentivegna, M., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., Giacomini, S., Milani, G., Ramponi, R., Mataloni, P., et al. (2014) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.135 · Cited by 312
Self-citationClassical simulation of commuting quantum computations implies collapse of the polynomial hierarchy
Bremner, M. J., Jozsa, R., & Shepherd, D. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0301 · Cited by 308
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature23458 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4086/toc.2013.v009a004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5672 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.130502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4230/LIPIcs.CCC.2017.22 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.063842 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.220502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062326 · DOI
- Leverrier A, 2015, Quantum Inf. Comput., 15, 489, 10.26421/QIC15.5-6-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012335 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021039 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.063822 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nphoton.2014.152 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.1400255 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.190501 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.230502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys4270 · DOI
- Clifford P, 2018, Proc. 29th Annual ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 146
- 10.1093/nsr/nwy079 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032324 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.060101 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042128 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/OPTICA.3.001460 · DOI · Paper page
- Demkowicz-Dobrzański R, 2015, Progress in Optics, 60, 345, 10.1016/bs.po.2015.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/9783527619238 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621 · DOI
- 10.1006/aphy.2002.6268 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.150501 · DOI
- Tóth G, 2014, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 47, 10.1088/1751-8113/47/42/424006 · DOI · Paper page
- Terhal B, 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput., 4, 134, 10.26421/QIC4.2-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042316 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041044 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys125 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.200405 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.133603 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013412 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.2134 · DOI
- 10.1364/OE.21.013450 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.080501 · DOI · Paper page
- van den Nest M, 2011, Quantum Inf. Comput., 11, 784, 10.26421/QIC11.9-10-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/09500340308233564 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008731.1008738 · DOI
- 10.1214/aoms/1177729330 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page
- Aaronson S, 2014, Quantum Inf. Comput., 14, 1383, 10.26421/QIC14.15-16-7 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.187904 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00220-007-0189-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.010302 · DOI
- 10.22331/q-2018-01-12-45 · DOI
- Streltsov A, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/123004 · DOI
- Lehmann E L, 2005, Testing Statistical Hypotheses
- 10.1063/1.4768252 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.062316 · DOI
- Sawicki A, 2016, Quantum Inf. Comput., 16, 0291, 10.26421/QIC16.3-4-6 · DOI
- 10.1080/0025570X.1991.11977606 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062329 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Photonic implementation of boson sampling: a review
Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Advanced Photonics · doi:10.1117/1.ap.1.3.034001 · Cited by 159
Self-citationComputational advantage of quantum random sampling
Hangleiter, D., & Eisert, J. (2023) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.95.035001 · Cited by 145
Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling
Deshpande, A., Mehta, A., Vincent, T., Quesada, N., Hinsche, M., Ioannou, M., Madsen, L., Lavoie, J., Qi, H., Eisert, J., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi7894 · Cited by 106
Regimes of Classical Simulability for Noisy Gaussian Boson Sampling
Qi, H., Brod, D. J., Quesada, N., & García-Patrón, R. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.100502 · Cited by 87
Self-citationFault-tolerant quantum speedup from constant depth quantum circuits
Mezher, R., Ghalbouni, J., Dgheim, J., & Markham, D. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033444 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Oszmaniec, M., & Brod, D. J.
- ORCID
- Brod, Daniel J
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-09-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 092002
- ISSN
- 1367-2630
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 7
- Licence
- Funders
- Fundation for Polish Science (Homing 2-2016/17)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
