Cited by 1,216Quantum Information and CryptographyPhotonic and Optical DevicesQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers

Open access
Clements, William R., Humphreys, Peter C., Metcalf, Benjamin J., Kolthammer, W. Steven, Walsmley, Ian A.·2016·Optica

Abstract

Universal multiport interferometers, which can be programmed to implement any linear transformation between multiple channels, are emerging as a powerful tool for both classical and quantum photonics. These interferometers are typically composed of a regular mesh of beam splitters and phase shifters, allowing for straightforward fabrication using integrated photonic architectures and ready scalability. The current, standard design for universal multiport interferometers is based on work by Reck et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58 (1994)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58]. We demonstrate a new design for universal multiport interferometers based on an alternative arrangement of beam splitters and phase shifters, which outperforms that by Reck et al. Our design requires half the optical depth of the Reck design and is significantly more robust to optical losses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.3.001460

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The C-A-K scheme and related ones are experimentally viable, theoretically clean and can implement any unitary on a single photon spread out over spatial modes.

    “This scheme and related ones such as in refs.41, 42 are experimentally viable, theoretically clean and can implement any unitary on a single photon spread out over spatial modes.”

    From Quantum generalisation of feedforward neural networks (2017) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [8]N. C. Harris, G. R. Steinbrecher, J. Mower, Y. Lahini, M. Prabhu, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, S. Lloyd, and D. Englund, 'Bosonic transport simulations in a large-scale programmable nanophotonic processor,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03406 , 2015. · arXiv
  2. [21]B. Peropadre, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, 'Spin models and boson sampling,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02703 , 2015. · arXiv
  3. [22]B. Peropadre, G. G. Guerreschi, J. Huh, and A. AspuruGuzik, 'Microwave boson sampling,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08064 , 2015. · arXiv
  4. [23]J. Mower, N. C. Harris, G. R. Steinbrecher, Y. Lahini, and D. Englund, 'High-fidelity quantum state evolution in imperfect photonic integrated circuits,' Physical Review A , vol. 92, no. 3, p. 032322, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walsmley, I. A.
Venue
Optica
Published
2016-12-06
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
1460
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320440260
Cited by
1,216
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 6
FWCI
35.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optica (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Research Council (ERC)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/K034480/1, NQIT)
  • European Commission (EC) (H2020-FETPROACT-2014 grant QUCHIP)
  • Research Councils UK (RCUK)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
beam splitter, phase shifters, integrated photonics, quantum photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review