The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utilizing encoding in scalable linear optics quantum computing
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a slightly altered form, the redundancy encountered in the Browne-Rudolph protocol can be used to make a scalable circuit-based optical quantum computer (Hayes et al. 2004; Gilchrist et al. 2005).
“In fact, in a slightly altered form, the redundancy that we encountered in the Browne-Rudolph protocol can be used to make a scalable circuit-based optical quantum computer (Hayes et al. 2004;Gilchrist et al. 2005).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Hayes et al. 2004
For this construction, an overall improvement in gate success is not achieved unless f < 1/2; first-level concatenation and t3 (f = 1/4) teleporters are required to achieve a CZ gate with better than 95% probability of success, and of order 10^4 operations would be required to implement such a gate (Hayes et al. 2004).
“Notice that, for this construction, an overall improvement in gate success is not achieved unless f < 1/2.Using these results one finds that first level concatenation and t 3 ( f = 1/4) teleporters are required to achieve a CZ gate with better than 95% probability of success.It can be estimated that of order 10 4 operations would be required in order to implement such a gate (Hayes et al. 2004).”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Hayes et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gottesman, D., & Chuang, I. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46503 · Cited by 1,860
Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C., & Branning, D. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02054 · Cited by 992
Self-citationExperimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination teleportation
Zhao, Z., Chen, Y.-A., Zhang, A.-N., Yang, T., Briegel, H. J., & Pan, J.-W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02643 · Cited by 602
Experimental controlled-NOT logic gate for single photons in the coincidence basis
Pittman, T. B., Fitch, M. J., Jacobs, B. C., & Franson, J. D. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.032316 · Cited by 328
Realization of a Photonic Controlled-NOT Gate Sufficient for Quantum Computation
Gasparoni, S., Pan, J.-W., Walther, P., Rudolph, T., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.020504 · Cited by 315
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- Ralph T C, 2001, Phys. Rev., 65, 012314, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
- Knill E, 2002, Phys. Rev., 66, 052306, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052306 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040503 · DOI · Paper page
- Lund A P, 2003, Phys. Rev., 68, 022313, 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.022313 · DOI
- 10.1038/37539 · DOI · Paper page
- van Kampen N G, 1992, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry
- 10.1103/PhysRevLetL89.137901 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Self-citationRalph, T. C., Hayes, A. J. F., & Gilchrist, A. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.100501 · Cited by 172
Self-citationHigh-fidelityZ-measurement error encoding of optical qubits
O’Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., & Ralph, T. C. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.060303 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, A. J. F., Gilchrist, A., Myers, C. R., & Ralph, T. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-10-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 533-541
- ISSN
- 1464-4266
- 1741-3575
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 5
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
