Cited by 72Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Gauge-invariant perturbations at second order: multiple scalar fields on large scales

Open access
Malik, Karim A·2005·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We derive the governing equations for multiple scalar fields minimally coupled to gravity in a flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker background spacetime on large scales. We include scalar perturbations up to second order and write the equations in terms of physically transparent gauge-invariant variables at first and second order. This allows us to write the perturbed Klein–Gordon equation at second order solely in terms of the field fluctuations on flat slices at first and second order.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/11/005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to the δN-formalism, ζ evaluated at some time tc is equivalent, on large scales, to the perturbation of the number of e-foldings N from an initial flat hypersurface at t* to a final comoving or uniform density hypersurface at tc.

    “According to the so called δN -formalism [30, 31, 32], ζ , evaluated at some time t = t c , is equivalent, on large scales , to the perturbation of the number of e -foldings N ( t c , t ∗ , x ) from an initial fl at hypersurface at t = t ∗ , to a final comoving - or, equivalently, uniform density - hypersurface at t = t c .”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [31]

    The introduction says the ΔN formalism relates the comoving curvature perturbation to a perturbation in the number of e-foldings. The discussion around Eq. (4.8) says comoving and uniform-density curvature perturbations coincide on large scales. Our copy does not specify the claimed initial flat and final comoving or uniform-density hypersurfaces for that e-folding calculation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For multi-field inflation, the scalar spectral index at lowest order in slow-roll is given by Eq. (15).

    “For multi-field inflation, the expression for the scalar spectral index has been given, for instance, in [31, 1]. At lowest order in slow-roll one has [2]”

    From Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation (2006) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction mentions calculating the spectral index, but gives no expression for it. Section 8 applies slow roll to a two-field model to calculate the second-order curvature perturbation, not the lowest-order scalar spectral index. A search for “spectral index” found no formula in our copy that could verify the attribution to Eq. (15). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Bardeen J M, 1980 Phys. Rev. D 22 1882 [SPIRES] · DOI · Paper page
  2. Liddle A R and Lyth D H, 2000 Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  3. Mukhanov V F, Abramo L R W and Brandenberger R H, 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 1624 [SPIRES] [gr-qc/9609026] · DOI
  4. Bruni M, Matarrese S, Mollerach S and Sonego S, 1997 Class. Quantum Grav. 14 2585 [SPIRES] [gr-qc/9609040] · DOI
  5. Acquaviva V, Bartolo N, Matarrese S and Riotto A, 2003 Nucl. Phys. B 667 119 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0209156] · DOI
  6. Maldacena J, 2003 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP05(2003)013 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0210603] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Nakamura K, 2003 Prog. Theor. Phys. 110 723 [SPIRES] [gr-qc/0303090] · DOI
  8. Noh H and Hwang J C, 2004 Phys. Rev. D 69 104011 [SPIRES] · DOI
  9. Bartolo N, Matarrese S and Riotto A, 2002 Phys. Rev. D 65 103505 [SPIRES] [hep-ph/0112261] · DOI
  10. Rigopoulos G, 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 1737 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0212141] · DOI
  11. Bernardeau F and Uzan J P, 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67 121301 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0209330] Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 11 (2005) 005 (stacks.iop.org/JCAP/2005/i=11/a=005) JCAP11(2005)005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Bernardeau F and Uzan J P, 2002 Phys. Rev. D 66 103506 [SPIRES] [hep-ph/0207295] · DOI · Paper page
  13. Malik K A and Wands D, 2004 Class. Quantum Grav. 21 L65 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0307055] · DOI
  14. Bartolo N, Komatsu E, Matarrese S and Riotto A, 2004 Phys. Rep. 402 103 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0406398] · DOI
  15. Bartolo N, Matarrese S and Riotto A, 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 231301 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0407505] · DOI
  16. Enqvist K and Vaihkonen A, 2004 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP09(2004)006 [SPIRES] [hep-ph/0405103] · DOI
  17. Vernizzi F, 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 061301 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0411463] · DOI · Paper page
  18. Tomita K, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0501663 · arXiv
  19. Lyth D H and Rodriguez Y, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0502578 · arXiv
  20. Seery D and Lidsey J E, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0503692 · arXiv
  21. Seery D and Lidsey J E, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0506056 · arXiv
  22. Salopek D S and Bond J R, 1990 Phys. Rev. D 42 3936 [SPIRES] · DOI
  23. Rigopoulos G I and Shellard E P S, 2004 Preprint astro-ph/0405185 · arXiv
  24. Rigopoulos G I, Shellard E P S and van Tent B W, 2004 Preprint astro-ph/0410486 · arXiv
  25. Rigopoulos G I, Shellard E P S and van Tent B J W, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0504508 · arXiv
  26. Sasaki M and Tanaka T, 1998 Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 763 [SPIRES] [gr-qc/9801017] · DOI · Paper page
  27. Lyth D H, Malik K A and Sasaki M, 2005 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP05(2005)004 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0411220] · DOI · Paper page
  28. Lyth D H and Rodriguez Y, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0504045 · arXiv
  29. Langlois D and Vernizzi F, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0503416 · arXiv
  30. Sasaki M and Stewart E D, A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation, 1996 Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 71 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/9507001] · DOI · Paper page
  31. Starobinsky A A, 1982 Phys. Lett. B 117 175 [SPIRES] · DOI
  32. Lyth D H, 1985 Phys. Rev. D 31 1792 [SPIRES] · DOI
  33. Malik K A and Wands D, 2005 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP02(2005)007 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0411703] · DOI
  34. Bartolo N, Matarrese S and Riotto A, 2004 J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. JCAP01(2004)003 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0309692] · DOI
  35. Wands D, Malik K A, Lyth D H and Liddle A R, 2000 Phys. Rev. D 62 043527 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0003278] · DOI · Paper page
  36. Malik K A, Wands D and Ungarelli C, 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67 063516 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0211602] · DOI
  37. Hwang J C, 1996 Preprint gr-qc/9608018 · arXiv
  38. Taruya A and Nambu Y, 1998 Phys. Lett. B 428 37 [SPIRES] [gr-qc/9709035] · DOI
  39. Gordon C, Wands D, Bassett B A and Maartens R, 2001 Phys. Rev. D 63 023506 [SPIRES] [astro-ph/0009131] · DOI · Paper page
  40. Vaihkonen A, 2005 Preprint astro-ph/0506304 · arXiv
  41. Polarski D and Starobinsky A A, 1992 Nucl. Phys. B 385 623 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malik, K. A.
Affiliations
Lancaster University (GB)
Corresponding author
Malik, Karim A
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2005-11-16
Volume
2005
Issue
11
Pages
005-005
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W1972011676
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
gauge-invariant perturbations, second-order perturbation theory, multiple scalar fields, scalar perturbations, Klein-Gordon equation, large-scale structure, FRW cosmology, cosmological perturbation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review