The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS
Open accessAbstract
On very large scales, density fluctuations in the Universe are small, suggesting a perturbative model for large-scale clustering of galaxies (or other dark matter tracers), in which the galaxy density is written as a Taylor series in the local mass density, δ, with the unknown coefficients in the series treated as free ``bias'' parameters. We extend this model to include dependence of the galaxy density on the local values of ∇ i ∇ j ϕ and ∇ i v j , where ϕ is the potential and v is the peculiar velocity. We show that only two new free parameters are needed to model the power spectrum and bispectrum up to 4th order in the initial density perturbations, once symmetry considerations and equivalences between possible terms are accounted for. One of the new parameters is a bias multiplying s ij s ji , where s ij = [∇ i ∇ j ∇ −2 −(1/3)δ K ij ]δ. The other multiplies s ij t ji , where t ij = [∇ i ∇ j ∇ −2 −(1/3)δ K ij ](θ−δ), with θ = −( a H d ln D / d ln a ) −1 ∇ ∙ v . (There are other, observationally equivalent, ways to write the two terms, e.g., using θ−δ instead of s ij s ji .) We show how short-range (non-gravitational) non-locality can be included through a controlled series of higher derivative terms, starting with R 2 ∇ 2 δ, where R is the scale of non-locality (this term will be a small correction as long as k 2 R 2 is small, where k is the observed wavenumber). We suggest that there will be much more information in future huge redshift surveys in the range of scales where beyond-linear perturbation theory is both necessary and sufficient than in the fully linear regime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.123514 · Cited by 830
Can a galaxy redshift survey measure dark energy clustering?
Takada, M. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.043505 · Cited by 59
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
d'Amico, G., Gleyzes, J., Kokron, N., Markovic, K., Senatore, L., Zhang, P., Beutler, F., & Gil-Marín, H. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/005 · Cited by 448
Gil-Marín, H., Bautista, J. E., Paviot, R., Vargas-Magaña, M., de la Torre, S., Fromenteau, S., Alam, S., Ávila, S., Burtin, E., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2455 · Cited by 292
How to evade the sample variance limit on measurements of redshift-space distortions
McDonald, P., & Seljak, U. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/007 · Cited by 268
Self-citationNeveux, R., Burtin, E., de Mattia, A., Smith, A., Ross, A. J., Hou, J., Bautista, J., Brinkmann, J., Chuang, C.-H., Dawson, K. S., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2780 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, P., & Roy, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-08-17
- Volume
- 2009
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 020-020
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W1978178159
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/020
- The paper
- McDonald, P., & Roy, A. (2009). Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.