The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2
Open accessAbstract
We measure the clustering of quasars of the final data release (DR16) of eBOSS. The sample contains $343\, 708$ quasars between redshifts 0.8 ≤ z ≤ 2.2 over $4699\, \mathrm{deg}^2$. We calculate the Legendre multipoles (0,2,4) of the anisotropic power spectrum and perform a BAO and a Full-Shape (FS) analysis at the effective redshift zeff = 1.480. The errors include systematic errors that amount to 1/3 of the statistical error. The systematic errors comprise a modelling part studied using a blind N-body mock challenge and observational effects studied with approximate mocks to account for various types of redshift smearing and fibre collisions. For the BAO analysis, we measure the transverse comoving distance DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.60 ± 0.90 and the Hubble distance DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.34 ± 0.60. This agrees with the configuration space analysis, and the consensus yields: DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.69 ± 0.80 and DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.26 ± 0.55. In the FS analysis, we fit the power spectrum using a model based on Regularised Perturbation Theory, which includes redshift space distortions and the Alcock–Paczynski effect. The results are DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.68 ± 0.90 and DH(zeff)/rdrag = 13.52 ± 0.51 and we constrain the linear growth rate of structure f(zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.476 ± 0.047. Our results agree with the configuration space analysis. The consensus analysis of the eBOSS quasar sample yields: DM(zeff)/rdrag = 30.21 ± 0.79, DH(zeff)/rdrag = 3.23 ± 0.47, and f(zeff)σ8(zeff) = 0.462 ± 0.045 and is consistent with a flat ΛCDM cosmological model using Planck results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
<tt>emcee</tt>: The MCMC Hammer
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/670067 · Cited by 12,414
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×
“Central quasars are placed at the centre of the halo, while satellites are placed according either according to a NFW profile (Navarro et al. 1996) or by drawing a particle from a 1% subsample of the particles belonging to the halo.”
MethodTHE WIDE-FIELD INFRARED SURVEY EXPLORER (WISE): MISSION DESCRIPTION AND INITIAL ON-ORBIT PERFORMANCE
Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., Ressler, M. E., Cutri, R. M., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Padgett, D., McMillan, R. S., Skrutskie, M., et al. (2010) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868 · Cited by 7,987
Eisenstein, D. J., Zehavi, I., Hogg, D. W., Scoccimarro, R., Blanton, M. R., Nichol, R. C., Scranton, R., Seo, H., Tegmark, M., Zheng, Z., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/466512 · Cited by 4,629
Self-citationDark Matter as a Topological Vacuum Condensate
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,403
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citationClustering in real space and in redshift space
Kaiser, N. (1987) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/227.1.1 · Cited by 2,750
Cited by
Alam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
Self-citationDark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationHou, J., Sánchez, A. G., Ross, A. J., Smith, A., Neveux, R., Bautista, J., Burtin, E., Zhao, C., Scoccimarro, R., Dawson, K. S., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3234 · Cited by 328
Self-citationDi Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., Gómez-Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C. D., Bruck, C. V. D., et al. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 · Cited by 319
Gil-Marín, H., Bautista, J. E., Paviot, R., Vargas-Magaña, M., de la Torre, S., Fromenteau, S., Alam, S., Ávila, S., Burtin, E., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2455 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Neveux, R., Burtin, E., de Mattia, A., Smith, A., Ross, A. J., Hou, J., Bautista, J., Brinkmann, J., Chuang, C.-H., Dawson, K. S., Gil-Marín, H., W. Lyke, B., de la Macorra, A., du Mas des Bourboux, H., Mohammad, F. G., Müller, E.-M., Myers, A. D., Newman, J. A., Percival, W. J., Rossi, G., Schneider, D., Vivek, M., Zarrouk, P., Zhao, C., & Zhao, G.-B.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-09-12
- Volume
- 499
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 210-229
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3043185795
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/staa2780
- The paper
- Neveux, R., Burtin, E., de Mattia, A., Smith, A., Ross, A. J., Hou, J., Bautista, J., Brinkmann, J., Chuang, C.-H., Dawson, K. S., Gil-Marín, H., W. Lyke, B., de la Macorra, A., du Mas des Bourboux, H., Mohammad, F. G., Müller, E.-M., Myers, A. D., Newman, J. A., Percival, W. J., . . . Zhao, G.-B. (2020). The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
