Laser ablation efficiency during the production of ag nanoparticles in ethanol at a low pulse repetition rate (1–10 Hz)
Abstract
We studied the effect of the repetition rate of laser pulses (RRLP) in the range from 1–10 Hz in the production of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) by laser ablation in ethanol. Laser pulses with a duration of 7 ns, a wavelength of 1064 nm and an energy of 60 mJ were used to ablate a 99.99% pure silver target immersed in 10 ml of ethanol. Transmittance analysis and atomic absorption spectroscopy were used to study the silver concentration in the colloidal solutions. The ablation process was studied by measuring the transmission of the laser pulses through the colloid. It is shown that for a fixed number of laser pulses (NLP) the ablation efficiency, in terms of the ablated silver mass per laser pulse, increases with the RRLP. This result contradicts what had previously been established in the literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alva et al. showed that the productivity and ablation efficiency of Ag NPs increased with an increase in the PRR.
“It was shown that the productivity and ablation efficiency of Ag NPs increased with an increase in the PRR.”
The strategy to reduce shielding caused by previous pulses is to spatially separate successive laser pulses by adjusting the interplay of the laser spot size, the scanning speed and the pulse repetition rate.
“The strategy is to spatially separate successive laser pulses by adjusting the interplay of the laser spot size, the scanning speed (relative movement between laser beam and target) and the pulse repetition rate to avoid shielding caused by the previous pulse [82,84,90,91,116].”
From Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications (2020) · cites this paper as [116]
Cites
Streubel, R., Barcikowski, S., & Gökce, B. (2016) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.41.001486 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Messina, G. C., Wagener, P., Streubel, R., De Giacomo, A., Santagata, A., Compagnini, G., & Barcikowski, S. (2013) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c2cp42626a · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanoparticles Engineering by Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids: Concepts and Applications
Fazio, E., Gökce, B., De Giacomo, A., Meneghetti, M., Compagnini, G., Tommasini, M., Waag, F., Lucotti, A., Zanchi, C. G., Ossi, P. M., et al. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10112317 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
“The strategy is to spatially separate successive laser pulses by adjusting the interplay of the laser spot size, the scanning speed (relative movement between laser beam and target) and the pulse repetition rate to avoid shielding caused by the previous pulse [82,84,90,91,116].”
BackgroundNaser, H., Alghoul, M. A., Hossain, M. K., Asim, N., Abdullah, M. F., Ali, M. S., Alzubi, F. G., & Amin, N. (2019) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-019-4690-3 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Subhan, A., Mourad, A.-H. I., & Al-Douri, Y. (2022) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano12132144 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“[125] investigated the effects of the laser ablation efficiency by varying the PRR (1–10 Hz) of Ag NPs in ethanol.”
BackgroundNikolov, A. S., Balchev, I. I., Nedyalkov, N. N., Kostadinov, I. K., Karashanova, D. B., & Atanasova, G. B. (2017) · Applied Physics A · doi:10.1007/s00339-017-1328-0 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mozaffari, H., & Mahdieh, M. H. (2020) · Optics & Laser Technology · doi:10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106083 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Valverde-Alva, M. A., García-Fernández, T., Esparza-Alegría, E., Villagrán-Muniz, M., Sánchez-Aké, C., Castañeda-Guzmán, R., de la Mora, M. B., Márquez-Herrera, C. E., & Sánchez Llamazares, J. L.
- Affiliations
- National University of Trujillo (PE)
- Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
- CONACyT Research Fellow - CCADET Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
- Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM)
- Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica A.C.
- Venue
- Laser Physics Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-09-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 106002
- ISSN
- 1612-2011 (ISSN-L)
- 1612-202X
- OpenAlex
- W2511627862
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Laser Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
- Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- laser ablation in liquid, silver nanoparticles, ethanol, ablation efficiency, nanoparticle synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
