The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated EEG sleep staging in the term-age baby using a generative modelling approach
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: We develop a method for automated four-state sleep classification of preterm and term-born babies at term-age of 38-40 weeks postmenstrual age (the age since the last menstrual cycle of the mother) using multichannel electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. At this critical age, EEG differentiates from broader quiet sleep (QS) and active sleep (AS) stages to four, more complex states, and the quality and timing of this differentiation is indicative of the level of brain development. However, existing methods for automated sleep classification remain focussed only on QS and AS sleep classification. APPROACH: EEG features were calculated from 16 EEG recordings, in 30 s epochs, and personalized feature scaling used to correct for some of the inter-recording variability, by standardizing each recording's feature data using its mean and standard deviation. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) and Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were trained, with the HMM incorporating knowledge of the sleep state transition probabilities. Performance of the GMM and HMM (with and without scaling) were compared, and Cohen's kappa agreement calculated between the estimates and clinicians' visual labels. MAIN RESULTS: For four-state classification, the HMM proved superior to the GMM. With the inclusion of personalized feature scaling, mean kappa (±standard deviation) was 0.62 (±0.16) compared to the GMM value of 0.55 (±0.15). Without feature scaling, kappas for the HMM and GMM dropped to 0.56 (±0.18) and 0.51 (±0.15), respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to present a successful method for the automated staging of four states in term-age sleep using multichannel EEG. Results suggested a benefit in incorporating transition information using an HMM, and correcting for inter-recording variability through personalized feature scaling. Determining the timing and quality of these states are indicative of developmental delays in both preterm and term-born babies that may lead to learning problems by school age.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on adversarial training process, some of the most recent works performed subject-invariant learning, which makes the system less sensitive to personal and environmental factors112,121.”
From The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine (2020) · cites this paper as [121]
Citations
Cites
Brain injury in premature neonates: A primary cerebral dysmaturation disorder?
Back, S. A., & Miller, S. P. (2014) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24132 · Cited by 360
EEG-based neonatal seizure detection with Support Vector Machines
Temko, A., Thomas, E., Marnane, W., Lightbody, G., & Boylan, G. (2011) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.06.034 · Cited by 339
Research works printed but not linked: 60
- 10.1542/peds.2008-2816 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60380-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04216.x · DOI
- 10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clp.2006.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/15.5.442 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhv219 · DOI
- 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31822f24af · DOI
- 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2004.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.06.014 · DOI
- 10.5664/jcsm.5600 · DOI
- 10.1053/smrv.2002.0243 · DOI
- 10.1142/S012906571750023X · DOI
- 10.1080/1086508X.2005.11079505 · DOI
- Stockard-Pope J, 1992, Atlas of Neonatal Electroencephalography
- Grigg-Damberger M, 2007, J. Clin. Sleep Med., 3, 201, 10.5664/jcsm.26819 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neucli.2010.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2004-1422 · DOI
- 10.1016/0887-8994(95)00052-H · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sleep.2007.08.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00641-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000085 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/28.11.1428 · DOI
- Gerla V, 2007, Int. J. Bioelectromagn., 9, 25
- 10.3390/e19100516 · DOI
- 10.3390/e18090272 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.11.024 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/27.7.1384 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.015 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10916-014-0018-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.04.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.02.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.02.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.362 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-75867-9_25 · DOI
- Löfhede J, 2008, J. Neural Eng., 5, 402, 10.1088/1741-2560/5/4/005 · DOI
- Huang R S, 2001, Proc. Natl Sci. Counc., 25, 17
- Löfhede J, 2010, J. Neural Eng., 7, 16007, 10.1088/1741-2560/7/1/016007 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICIEA.2009.5138842 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.06.021 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/19.1.18 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02347703 · DOI · Paper page
- Temko A, 2012, J. Neural Eng., 9, 46002, 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/046002 · DOI
- 10.1109/THMS.2015.2476818 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4614-4998-0_7 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471721182 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9780470740156 · DOI
- 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318200f983 · DOI
- Gwet K, 2012, Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: the Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement among Multiple Raters
- 10.1214/aos/1176344552 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.250 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.02.024 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.021906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0010-4825(88)90041-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of sleep health: a data-driven revolution in sleep science and medicine
Perez-Pozuelo, I., Zhai, B., Palotti, J., Mall, R., Aupetit, M., Garcia-Gomez, J. M., Taheri, S., Guan, Y., & Fernandez-Luque, L. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0244-4 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Pillay, K., Dereymaeker, A., Jansen, K., Naulaers, G., Van Huffel, S., & De Vos, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Pillay, Kirubin
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-02-27
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 036004
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2793410326
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (acceptedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (098461, 098461/Z/12/Z, 098461/Z/12, 098461/Z)
- Research Councils UK (EP/G036861/1)
- KU Leuven (C24/15/036)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1515820)
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU Leuven
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (339804)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- automated sleep staging, preterm infants, multichannel EEG, hidden Markov models, Gaussian mixture model, sleep state transitions, quiet sleep, active sleep, infant brain development, developmental delay
- MeSH terms
- Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Sleep Stages, Term Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review