Cited by 2,482Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals

Costa, Madalena, Goldberger, Ary L., Peng, C.-K.·2005·Physical Review E

Abstract

Traditional approaches to measuring the complexity of biological signals fail to account for the multiple time scales inherent in such time series. These algorithms have yielded contradictory findings when applied to real-world datasets obtained in health and disease states. We describe in detail the basis and implementation of the multiscale entropy (MSE) method. We extend and elaborate previous findings showing its applicability to the fluctuations of the human heartbeat under physiologic and pathologic conditions. The method consistently indicates a loss of complexity with aging, with an erratic cardiac arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation), and with a life-threatening syndrome (congestive heart failure). Further, these different conditions have distinct MSE curve profiles, suggesting diagnostic uses. The results support a general "complexity-loss" theory of aging and disease. We also apply the method to the analysis of coding and noncoding DNA sequences and find that the latter have higher multiscale entropy, consistent with the emerging view that so-called "junk DNA" sequences contain important biological information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.71.021906

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L., & Peng, C.-K.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2005-02-18
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
021906-021906
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2059851411
Cited by
2,482
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 173 · 2021: 206 · 2020: 211 · 2019: 228 · 2018: 180 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 120 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 70
FWCI
20.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review E (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (H75-CCH119124)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR013622, P41 RR13622)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD039838, R01-HD39838)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
multiscale entropy, heart rate variability, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, aging, non-coding DNA, junk DNA, time series analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Computer Simulation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Models, Chemical, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review