The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update
Open accessAbstract
Objective . Most current electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately ten years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs. Approach . We surveyed the BCI and machine learning literature from 2007 to 2017 to identify the new classification approaches that have been investigated to design BCIs. We synthesize these studies in order to present such algorithms, to report how they were used for BCIs, what were the outcomes, and to identify their pros and cons. Main results . We found that the recently designed classification algorithms for EEG-based BCIs can be divided into four main categories: adaptive classifiers, matrix and tensor classifiers, transfer learning and deep learning, plus a few other miscellaneous classifiers. Among these, adaptive classifiers were demonstrated to be generally superior to static ones, even with unsupervised adaptation. Transfer learning can also prove useful although the benefits of transfer learning remain unpredictable. Riemannian geometry-based methods have reached state-of-the-art performances on multiple BCI problems and deserve to be explored more thoroughly, along with tensor-based methods. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis and random forests also appear particularly useful for small training samples settings. On the other hand, deep learning methods have not yet shown convincing improvement over state-of-the-art BCI methods. Significance . This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“If the data dimension is too large, the Riemannian Geometry method will perform many calculations, which is time-consuming and causes statistical deviations [22].”
From Transfer Learning Algorithm of P300-EEG Signal Based on XDAWN Spatial Filter and Riemannian Geometry Classifier (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“xDAWN spatial filtering [13] with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN+RG) features also perform well cross-subject [14], [15] but lack obvious physiological interpretation [8].”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“General-purpose deep learning architectures such as EEGNet [6], [7], [8] have been evaluated across multiple BCI paradigms”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Allwein, 2001, Reducing multiclass to binary: A unifying approach for margin classifiers, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 1, 113
- Chevallier, 2018, Riemannian classification for SSVEP-based BCI, 10.1201/9781351231954-19 · DOI
- Guyon, 2003, An introduction to variable and feature selection, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,003
EEG-Based Error Detection Can Challenge Human Reaction Time in a VR Navigation Task
Wimmer, M., Weidinger, N., ElSayed, N., Müller-Putz, G., & Veas, E. E. (2023) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar59233.2023.00113 · Cited by 9
Beta bursts question the ruling power for brain–computer interfaces
Papadopoulos, S., Szul, M. J., Congedo, M., Bonaiuto, J. J., & Mattout, J. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad19ea · Cited by 8
“Meanwhile, a great body of work has developed an arsenal of advanced pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification algorithms dedicated specifically or adapted to the particular characteristics and limitations of EEG signals [56, 57].”
Self-citationEsfahani, M. M., Najafi, M. H., & Sadati, S. H. (2023) · International Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS) · doi:10.1109/icspis59665.2023.10402664 · Cited by 8
“In contrast, the right hemisphere performs over the left side of the body, primarily engaged in logical reasoning and the realms of scientific and mathematical thinking[13], [16].”
BackgroundWelter, M., & Lotte, F. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1341790 · Cited by 12
Self-citationJiao, Y., Zheng, Q., Qiao, D., Lang, X., Xie, L., & Pan, Y. F. (2024) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-024-00984-1 · Cited by 8
NeuroAiR: Deep Learning Framework for Airwriting Recognition From Scalp-Recorded Neural Signals
Tripathi, A., Gupta, A., Prathosh, A. P., Muthukrishnan, S. P., & Kumar, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3381720 · Cited by 8
Chiossi, F., Ou, C., Putze, F., & Mayer, S. (2024) · International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM) · doi:10.1145/3701571.3701579 · Cited by 8
“This approach helps understand the balance between maximizing accuracy and minimizing computational load, which supports real-time VR applications that rely on efficient processing.”
InfluentialPan, S., Shen, T., Lian, Y., & Shi, L. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15010027 · Cited by 12
EEG Signal Processing Techniques and Applications—2nd Edition
Wei, H., Guo, Y., He, F., et al. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25030805 · Cited by 8
Single-trial P300 classification using deep belief networks for a BCI system
Cortez, S. A., Flores, C., & Andreu-Pérez, J. (2020) · doi:10.1109/intercon50315.2020.9220255 · Cited by 8
Comparison of Classification Algorithms Towards Subject-Specific and Subject-Independent BCI
Ghane, P., Naghsh, N. Z., & Braga-Neto, U. (2021) · International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) · doi:10.1109/bci51272.2021.9385339 · Cited by 9
Brain network dynamics fingerprints are resilient to data heterogeneity
Menara, T., Lisi, G., Pasqualetti, F., & Cortese, A. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abd684 · Cited by 8
Multiple Kernel Learning With Minority Oversampling for Classifying Imbalanced Data
Wang, L., Wang, H., & Fu, G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3046604 · Cited by 8
Guidelines to use Transfer Learning for Motor Imagery Detection: an experimental study
Bougrain, L., Rimbert, S., Rodrigues, P. L. C., Canron, G., & Lotte, F. (2021) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner49283.2021.9441254 · Cited by 9
Self-citationChallenges and Opportunities in Consumer Neuroergonomics
Brouwer, A.-M. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2021.606646 · Cited by 8
Riemannian Geometry on Connectivity for Clinical BCI
Corsi, M., Yger, F., Chevallier, S., & Noûs, C. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9414790 · Cited by 8
Self-citationThe emergence of machine learning in auditory neural impairment: A systematic review
Bakar, A. R. A., Lai, K. W., & Hamzaid, N. A. (2021) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136250 · Cited by 8
Zisk, A. H., Borgheai, S. B., McLinden, J., Deligani, R. J., & Shahriari, Y. (2021) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2021.2014678 · Cited by 8
Liu, Y., Habibnezhad, M., & Jebelli, H. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77163-8_9 · Cited by 8
Robustly Effective Approaches on Motor Imagery-Based Brain Computer Interfaces
Moumgiakmas, S. S., & Papakostas, G. A. (2022) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers11050061 · Cited by 8
Cross-Subject fNIRS Signals Channel-Selection based on Multi-Objective NSGA-II Algorithm
Esfahani, M. M., & Sadati, S. H. (2021) · National and International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME) · doi:10.1109/icbme54433.2021.9750364 · Cited by 8
An Optimized SWCSP Technique for Feature Extraction in EEG-based BCI System
Ghumman, N. S., & Jindal, B. (2022) · ARO-The Scientific Journal of Koya University · doi:10.14500/aro.10926 · Cited by 8
Esfahani, M. M., & Sadati, S. H. (2022) · doi:10.1109/icee55646.2022.9827057 · Cited by 8
Sorinas, J., Fernandez-Troyano, J. C., Vicente, J. M. F., & Fernández, E. (2022) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065722500575 · Cited by 8
Hong, J., Shamsi, F., & Najafizadeh, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871446 · Cited by 8
Tong, J., Wei, X., Dong, E., Sun, Z., Du, S., & Duan, F. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac9a01 · Cited by 8
Online learning using projections onto shrinkage closed balls for adaptive brain-computer interface
Ma, Z., Cheng, J. S., & Tao, D. (2019) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107017 · Cited by 8
Recognizing single-trial motor imagery EEG based on interpretable clustering method
Fu, R., Li, W., Chen, J., et al. (2020) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102171 · Cited by 8
Does tranexamic acid reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirement in knee arthroplasty?
Atik, O. Ş. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 8
Bayesian multi-dipole modelling in the frequency domain
Luria, G., Duran, D., Visani, E., Sommariva, S., Rotondi, F., Sebastiano, D. R., Panzica, F., Piana, M., & Sorrentino, A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.11.007 · Cited by 8
Zhao, H., Karlsson, P., Chiu, D., Sun, C., Kavehei, O., & McEwan, A. L. (2023) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00818-8 · Cited by 7
“The speller flashes the alphabetic keys in random order, and then the algorithm matches the flash time with the P300 appearance time and selects the corresponding alphabet letter (Lotte et al. 2018).”
MethodPenava, P., & Buettner, R. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3326720 · Cited by 7
Tveitstøl, T., Tveter, M., T, A. S. P., Hatlestad‐Hall, C., Yazidi, A., Hammer, H. L., & Haraldsen, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2023.1272791 · Cited by 11
Soler, A. F., Giraldo, E., & Molinas, M. (2024) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-024-00224-z · Cited by 7
“Most of the BCIs are based on the analysis performed using the information registered by the electrodes on the scalp (electrode space) [15], which is characterized by the low spatial resolution due to the volume conduction effect.”
MethodSurface Electromyography-Based Recognition of Electronic Taste Sensations
Ullah, A., Zhang, F., Song, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, S., Riaz, W., & Li, G. (2024) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios14080396 · Cited by 7
“FC Frequency 1 RMSF Frequency 1 The concentration of energy in the sEMG sample spectrum was primarily observed below 100 Hz, which can be a tt ributed to the low-pass fi lter introduced by the circular electrode [66].”
BackgroundEEG-based action anticipation in human-robot interaction: a comparative pilot study
Vieira, R., Moreno, P., & Vourvopoulos, A. (2024) · Frontiers Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2024.1491721 · Cited by 6
Predicting Workload in Virtual Flight Simulations Using EEG Spectral and Connectivity Features
Verkennis, B., van Weelden, E., Marogna, F. L., Alimardani, M., Wiltshire, T. J., & Louwerse, M. M. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and eXtended and Virtual Reality (AIxVR) · doi:10.1109/aixvr63409.2025.00019 · Cited by 6
“One of the reasons is that EEG datasets are normally small-scale and extracting various features from the data creates the curse of dimensionality [27].”
Schroeder, F., Fairclough, S. H., Dehais, F., & Richins, M. T. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1582724 · Cited by 7
Xiong, Y., Li, J., Zhuang, Y., Zhao, X., Xu, Y., & Jie, L. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108421 · Cited by 7
Enhancing emotion recognition through multi-modal data fusion and graph neural networks
Devarajan, K., Ponnan, S., & Perumal, S. (2025) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2025.100291 · Cited by 8
Milyani, A. H., & Attar, E. T. (2025) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1668935 · Cited by 9
“Additionally, many studies report inflated accuracy due to within-subject validation, which overlooks the considerable inter-individual variability in EEG and fMRI responses (Lotte et al., 2018).”
Modeling Working Memory in Neurodegeneration: A Focus on EEG Methods
Komarova, Y. S., Zakharov, A. V., Sergeeva, M. S., Romanchuk, N., Vladimirova, T., & Shirolapov, I. V. (2025) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics15232992 · Cited by 7
Classification of Non-Discriminant ERD/ERS Comprising Motor Imagery Electroencephalography Signals
Unnisa, Z., Sultan, M., Butt, U. M., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0110146 · Cited by 7
Improving Motor Imagery EEG Classification by CNN with Data Augmentation
Du, B., Liu, Y., & Tian, G. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC) · doi:10.1109/iccicc50026.2020.9450227 · Cited by 6
Brain computer interfacing system using grey wolf optimizer and deep neural networks
Nakra, A., & Duhan, M. (2022) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-022-01066-w · Cited by 7
Xu, H., Anmin, G., Luo, J., Fan, W., Ding, P., & Fu, Y. (2023) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104554 · Cited by 7
Poppe, C. J., & Elger, B. S. (2023) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-023-10256-5 · Cited by 10
A study of EEG classification based on attention mechanism and EEGNet Motor Imagination
Liu, M., Cao, F., Wang, X., & Yang, Y. (2023) · International Symposium on Computer Technology and Information Science (ISCTIS) · doi:10.1109/isctis58954.2023.10213202 · Cited by 7
Weirich, C., Lin, Y., & Khanh, T. Q. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1248824 · Cited by 8
Wang, Y., Xu, Z., & Gao, N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3339857 · Cited by 7
Liu, J., Zhu, Y., Cong, F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110110 · Cited by 7
Peng, B.-L., Bi, L., Wang, Z., Feleke, A. G., & Fei, W.-J. (2024) · IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2024.3379451 · Cited by 6
“B RAIN-COMPUTER interface (BCI) is defined as a sys-tem of integrated hardware and software that extracts and delivers information deciphered from brain neurophysiological signals to the external world [1], [2].”
BackgroundSimar, C., Colot, M., Cebolla, A.-M., Petieau, M., Cheron, G. A., & Bontempi, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1329411 · Cited by 9
Meenakshinathan, J., Gupta, V., Reddy, T. K., Behera, L., & Sandhan, T. (2024) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-024-03137-5 · Cited by 7
Occupational Health and Neuroergonomics
Brandt‐Rauf, P. W., & Ayaz, H. (2024) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000003080 · Cited by 7
Intentional binding for noninvasive BCI control
Venot, T., Desbois, A., Corsi, M., Hugueville, L., Saint-Bauzel, L., & Fallani, F. D. V. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad628c · Cited by 7
“Basic research in electrophysiology as well as methodological advances in signal processing and machine learning have made considerable progresses [4].”
Cheng, S., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., & Dong, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456147 · Cited by 7
“For this reason, various attempts have been made to improve participants’ MI performance, including methods such as improved algorithms for analyzing electroencephalography (EEG), and algorithms for fusing EEG signals with other electrophysiological features [28,30,54,56].”
MethodDriver fatigue recognition using limited amount of individual electroencephalogram
Seo, P., Kim, H., & Kim, K. H. (2024) · Biomedical Engineering Letters · doi:10.1007/s13534-024-00431-x · Cited by 7
“The generalizability of EEG is constrained by intrinsic individual differences in brain activity as well as varia - tions in the anatomical structure of the brain, head size, and cap placement [ 27 , 28].”
Wang, B., Miao, M., Zhang, K., Liu, W., Sheng, Z., Xu, B., & Hu, W. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9135 · Cited by 8
“However, the complex intrinsic characteristics of EEG signal, such as low signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity to noise and high inter-trial variability, still limit the recognition accuracy and generalization performance of MI-EEG decoding model [9]. multi-channel MI/ME-EEG.”
Learning Neural Bag-of-Matrix-Summarization with Riemannian Network
Liu, H., Li, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33018746 · Cited by 7
Cruz-Garza, J. G., Chatufale, G., Robleto, D., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_10 · Cited by 7
Sadatnejad, K., Roc, A., Pillette, L., Appriou, A., Monseigne, T., & Lotte, F. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp40776.2020.9053101 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPaired Trial Classification: A Novel Deep Learning Technique for MVPA
Williams, J. M., Samal, A. K., Rao, P., & Johnson, M. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00417 · Cited by 7
A graph-theoretic sensor-selection scheme for covariance-based Motor Imagery (MI) decoding
Georgiadis, K., Adamos, D. A., Nikolopoulos, S., et al. (2020) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco47968.2020.9287865 · Cited by 7
Corticomuscular coupling analysis based on improved LSTM and transfer entropy
Ye, F., Sun, Z., Yang, D., et al. (2021) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136012 · Cited by 7
Mammone, N., Ieracitano, C., & Morabito, F. C. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534028 · Cited by 7
Brain–Computer Interface for Controlling Lower-Limb Exoskeletons
Pino, A., Tovar, N., Barría, P., Baleta, K., Múnera, M., & Cifuentes, C. A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79630-3_9 · Cited by 7
Chen, J., Yi, W., & Wang, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc46164.2021.9629728 · Cited by 7
Neural Network Model for Artifacts Marking in EEG Signals
Komisaruk, O., & Nikulchev, E. V. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0121204 · Cited by 7
Mahmood, S., Shin, J., Farhana, I., Islam, M. R., & Molla, M. K. I. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3136774 · Cited by 8
Singh, N. P., Gautam, A. K., & Sharan, T. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91197-9.00015-1 · Cited by 8
End-to-end P300 BCI using Bayesian accumulation of Riemannian probabilities
Barthélemy, Q., Chevallier, S., Bertrand-Lalo, R., & Clisson, P. (2022) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2022.2140467 · Cited by 7
Datafied Brains and Digital Twins: Lessons From Industry, Caution For Psychiatry
Rainey, S. (2022) · Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology · doi:10.1353/ppp.2022.0005 · Cited by 7
Mental State Classification Using Multi-Graph Features
Chen, G., Helm, H. S., Lytvynets, K., Yang, W., & Priebe, C. E. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.930291 · Cited by 11
Huang, Z., Jiang, K., Li, J., et al. (2022) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-022-02557-5 · Cited by 7
Tobón-Henao, M., Álvarez-Meza, A. M., & Castellanos-Dominguez, G. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22155771 · Cited by 7
Sorkhi, M., Jahed‐Motlagh, M. R., Bidgoli, B. M., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s012918312350047x · Cited by 7
KAM - A Kernel Attention Module for Emotion Classification with EEG Data
Kuang, D., & Michoski, C. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17976-1_9 · Cited by 7
Strahnen, M., & Kessler, P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3228164 · Cited by 7
CNN with Self-attention in EEG Classification
Wang, X., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17618-0_36 · Cited by 9
Classification of EEG Motor Imagery Tasks Using Convolution Neural Networks
Ling, S. H., Makgawinata, H., Monsivais, F. H., Lourenco, A. D. S. G., Lyu, J., & Chai, R. (2019) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8857933 · Cited by 7
Neural Net-Based Approach to EEG Signal Acquisition and Classification in BCI Applications
Chenane, K., Touati, Y., Boubchir, L., et al. (2019) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers8040087 · Cited by 7
Research on the Key Technologies of Motor Imagery EEG Signal Based on Deep Learning
Wang, Z., Ma, Z., Du, X., et al. (2020) · Journal of Autonomous Intelligence · doi:10.32629/jai.v2i4.60 · Cited by 7
EEG Signals Analysis And Classification For BCI Systems: A Review
Vishwakarma, R., Khwaja, H., Samant, V., Gaude, P., Gambhir, M., & Aswale, S. (2020) · International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ICETITE) · doi:10.1109/ic-etite47903.2020.066 · Cited by 8
Saa, J. F. D., Christen, A., Martin, S., Pasley, B. N., Knight, R. T., & Giraud, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63303-1 · Cited by 7
A Hierarchical Fusion Strategy Based on EEG and sEMG for Human-Exoskeleton System
Li, M., Duan, S., Dong, Y., Wang, C., Feng, W., & Wu, X. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) · doi:10.1109/rcar49640.2020.9303041 · Cited by 7
Shamsi, F., & Najafizadeh, L. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67494-6_1 · Cited by 7
Context Modelling in Ambient Assisted Living: Trends and Lessons
Tekemetieu, A. A., Haidon, C., Bergeron, F., et al. (2021) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70478-0_10 · Cited by 7
Manifold Trial Selection to Reduce Negative Transfer in Motor Imagery-based Brain–Computer Interface
Liang, Z., Zheng, Z., Chen, W., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Chen, J., & Chen, Z. (2021) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636137 · Cited by 7
Alsuradi, H., & Eid, M. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2023.3270666 · Cited by 7
Differential evolution based spatial filter optimization for brain-computer interface
de Souza, G. H., Bernardino, H. S., Vieira, A. B., et al. (2019) · Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) · doi:10.1145/3321707.3321791 · Cited by 7
Data as a Cross-Cutting Dimension of Ethical Importance in Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies
Rainey, S., Bublitz, C., Maslen, H., & Thornton, H. (2019) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2019.1665134 · Cited by 7
MutualGraphNet: A novel model for motor imagery classificationPreprint
Li, Y., Zhong, N., Taniar, D., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.04361 · Cited by 7
Good Scientific Practice in MEEG Research: Progress and PerspectivesPreprint
Niso, G., Krol, L. R., Combrisson, E., Dubarry, A., Elliott, M., Clément, F., Héjja‐Brichard, Y., Herbst, S. K., Jerbi, K., Ković, V., et al. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/n2ryp · Cited by 7
Zhao, H., Yu, S., Prinable, J., McEwan, A., & Karlsson, P. (2020) · IFMBE Proceedings · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_226 · Cited by 9
Zhou, Z., Dou, G., & Qu, X. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19679-9_16 · Cited by 6
Decoding Braking Intentions From EEG Signals: A Convolution-Transformer Network Approach
Li, J., Liang, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2024) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3468951 · Cited by 6
Vourvopoulos, A., Fleury, M., Blanco-Mora, D. A., Fernandes, J.-C., Figueiredo, P. ́., & Badia, S. B. I. (2024) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2024.2409463 · Cited by 6
Chowdhury, R. S., Bose, S., Ghosh, S., & Konar, A. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109260 · Cited by 6
Ahmed, S. G., Ambali Parambil, M. M., Damseh, R., Bouktif, S., Alnajjar, F., & Belkacem, A. N. (2026) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2026.1840121 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
- GIPSA-Lab (FR)
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes (FR)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lotte, F
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 031005
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2794345050
- Cited by
- 2,239
- References
- 266
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 284 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 283 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 321 · 2020: 273 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 49
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Polish National Science Center (2016/20/W/N24/00354)
- Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (14.756.31.0001)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE23-0013-01)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2016-STG-714567)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- EEG-based brain-computer interface, EEG classification, machine learning classifiers, adaptive classifier, unsupervised adaptation, transfer learning, deep learning, Riemannian geometry, random forest, small training samples
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review