The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update
Open accessAbstract
Objective . Most current electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately ten years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs. Approach . We surveyed the BCI and machine learning literature from 2007 to 2017 to identify the new classification approaches that have been investigated to design BCIs. We synthesize these studies in order to present such algorithms, to report how they were used for BCIs, what were the outcomes, and to identify their pros and cons. Main results . We found that the recently designed classification algorithms for EEG-based BCIs can be divided into four main categories: adaptive classifiers, matrix and tensor classifiers, transfer learning and deep learning, plus a few other miscellaneous classifiers. Among these, adaptive classifiers were demonstrated to be generally superior to static ones, even with unsupervised adaptation. Transfer learning can also prove useful although the benefits of transfer learning remain unpredictable. Riemannian geometry-based methods have reached state-of-the-art performances on multiple BCI problems and deserve to be explored more thoroughly, along with tensor-based methods. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis and random forests also appear particularly useful for small training samples settings. On the other hand, deep learning methods have not yet shown convincing improvement over state-of-the-art BCI methods. Significance . This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“If the data dimension is too large, the Riemannian Geometry method will perform many calculations, which is time-consuming and causes statistical deviations [22].”
From Transfer Learning Algorithm of P300-EEG Signal Based on XDAWN Spatial Filter and Riemannian Geometry Classifier (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“xDAWN spatial filtering [13] with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN+RG) features also perform well cross-subject [14], [15] but lack obvious physiological interpretation [8].”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“General-purpose deep learning architectures such as EEGNet [6], [7], [8] have been evaluated across multiple BCI paradigms”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Allwein, 2001, Reducing multiclass to binary: A unifying approach for margin classifiers, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 1, 113
- Chevallier, 2018, Riemannian classification for SSVEP-based BCI, 10.1201/9781351231954-19 · DOI
- Guyon, 2003, An introduction to variable and feature selection, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Simar, C., Cebolla, A.-M., Chartier, G., Petieau, M., Bontempi, G., Berthoz, A., & Cheron, G. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.588357 · Cited by 16
Ron-Angevín, R., Medina-Juliá, M. T., Fernández-Rodríguez, Á., Velasco-Álvarez, F., André, J., Lespinet‐Najib, V., & García, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2020.587702 · Cited by 17
Chu, L., Pei, L., & Qiu, R. C. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3105647 · Cited by 18
Liu, X., Hui, Q., Xu, S., et al. (2021) · Adjunct ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp/ISWC) · doi:10.1145/3460418.3480411 · Cited by 16
Ni, Z., Xu, J., Wu, Y., Li, M., Xu, G., & Xu, B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2022.3150007 · Cited by 16
Zhang, S., Wu, L., Yu, S., Shi, E., Qiang, N., Gao, H. B., Zhao, J., & Zhao, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3214225 · Cited by 16
Togha, M. M., Salehi, M. R., & Abiri, E. (2019) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2019.01.008 · Cited by 16
García-Murillo, D. G., Álvarez-Meza, A. M., & Castellanos-Dominguez, G. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21082750 · Cited by 16
Evaluation of White Matter Integrity Utilizing the DELPHI (TMS-EEG) System
Levy-Lamdan, O., Zifman, N., Sasson, E., Efrati, S., Hack, D. C., Tanné, D., Dolev, I., & Fogel, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.589107 · Cited by 16
Cao, J. H., Zhao, Y., Shan, X., Blackburn, D. J., Wei, J., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Chen, L., & Sarrigiannis, P. G. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac84ac · Cited by 15
Żygierewicz, J., Janik, R. A., Podolak, I. T., Drozd, A., Malinowska, U., Poziomska, M., Wojciechowski, J., Ogniewski, P., Niedbalski, P., Terczyńska, I., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac8b38 · Cited by 15
Time Majority Voting, a PC-Based EEG Classifier for Non-expert Users
Dou, G., Zhou, Z., & Qu, X. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-17618-0_29 · Cited by 16
Grevet, E., Forge, K., Tadiello, S., Izac, M., Amadieu, F., Brunel, L. C., Pillette, L., Py, J., Gasq, D., & Jeunet, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2022.1082901 · Cited by 15
Impact of dataset size and long-term ECoG-based BCI usage on deep learning decoders performance
Śliwowski, M., Martin, M., Souloumiac, A., Blanchart, P., & Aksenova, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1111645 · Cited by 20
Deep learning-based electroencephalic diagnosis of tinnitus symptom
Hong, E.-S., Kim, H.-S., Hong, S. K., Pantazis, D., & Min, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1126938 · Cited by 17
“Recently, there has been a growing interest in adapting convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for EEG signal processing (Schirrmeister et al., 2017; Acharya et al., 2018; Lotte et al., 2018; Roy et al., 2019).”
BackgroundHand gesture decoding using ultra-high-density EEG
Schreiner, L., Sieghartsleitner, S., Mayr, K., et al. (2023) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/ner52421.2023.10123901 · Cited by 15
Lan, W., Wang, R., He, Y., Zong, Y., Leng, Y., Iramina, K., Zheng, W., & Ge, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3309543 · Cited by 15
“How to expand the sample size from the existing data of trials/subjects/devices to reduce the training procedure has become a research trend and challenge in SSVEP research [11].”
BackgroundMammone, N., Ieracitano, C., Spataro, R., Guger, C., Cho, W., & Morabito, F. C. (2023) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065723500685 · Cited by 15
The Convergence of AI and BCIs
Jaber, W., Jaber, H. A. H., Jaber, R. A., & Saleh, Z. S. (2023) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0368-9.ch006 · Cited by 15
Measuring neuronal avalanches to inform brain-computer interfaces
Corsi, M., Sorrentino, P., Schwartz, D., George, N., Gollo, L. L., Chevallier, S., Hugueville, L., Kahn, A. E., Dupont, S., Bassett, D. S., et al. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108734 · Cited by 15
“…neuronal avalanches on the large scale is task-dependent Large-scale avalanches spread more through premotor areas during motor imagery Task-related differences are consistent over subjectsandrelatedtotask execution Neuronal avalanches properties allow task-decoding above the current gold standard”
BackgroundMethodArtifact removal and motor imagery classification in EEG using advanced algorithms and modified DNN
Akuthota, S., RajKumar, K., & Janapati, R. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27198 · Cited by 15
“Artifacts can distort the underlying neural signals, leading to inaccurate interpretations [5].”
BackgroundElnabawi, M., & Hamza, N. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14040879 · Cited by 17
A comparative study of stereo-dependent SSVEP targets and their impact on VR-BCI performance
Liu, H., Wang, Z., Li, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1367932 · Cited by 15
Toward the Construction of Affective Brain-Computer Interface: A Systematic Review
Chen, H., Li, J., He, H., Zhu, J., Sun, S., Li, X., & Hu, B. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3712259 · Cited by 18
Alhakeem, Z. M., Ali, R. S., & Abd‐Alhameed, R. A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2984538 · Cited by 15
Búza, K. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) · doi:10.1109/saci49304.2020.9118837 · Cited by 15
Zhao, H., Yang, Y., Karlsson, P., & McEwan, A. L. (2020) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-020-00458-x · Cited by 15
Covariation Informed Graph Slepians for Motor Imagery Decoding
Georgiadis, K., Adamos, D. A., Nikolopoulos, S., Laskaris, N., & Kompatsiaris, I. Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3049998 · Cited by 15
Deep Learning-Based Indoor Distance Estimation Scheme Using FMCW Radar
Park, K., Lee, J.-P., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Information · doi:10.3390/info12020080 · Cited by 15
EEG-based hybrid QWERTY mental speller with high information transfer rate
Katyal, A., & Singla, R. K. (2021) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-020-02310-w · Cited by 15
Hassan, M. M., Hassan, M. R., Huda, S., et al. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107453 · Cited by 15
A lexicographic cooperative co-evolutionary approach for feature selection
González, J., Ortega, J., Escobar, J. J., & Damas, M. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.003 · Cited by 15
Ouyang, G., Dien, J., & Lorenz, R. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac42b6 · Cited by 15
Motor Imagery Classification via Kernel-Based Domain Adaptation on an SPD Manifold
Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, K. W. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12050659 · Cited by 15
Human-Robot Co-Adaptation in Construction: Bio-Signal Based Control of Bricklaying Robots
Liu, Y., & Jebelli, H. (2022) · ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE) · doi:10.1061/9780784483893.038 · Cited by 15
Direct comparison of supervised and semi-supervised retraining approaches for co-adaptive BCIs
Schwarz, A., Brandstetter, J., Pereira, J., & Muller-Putz, G. R. (2019) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-019-02047-1 · Cited by 15
Tariq, M., Trivailo, P. M., & Simić, M. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.256 · Cited by 17
Lotte, F., Jeunet, C., Chavarriaga, R., Bougrain, L., Thompson, D. E., Scherer, R., Mowla, M. R., Kübler, A., Grosse‐Wentrup, M., Dijkstra, K., et al. (2019) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2019.1697143 · Cited by 17
Self-citationRoy, S., McCreadie, K. A., & Prasad, G. (2019) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2019.8914623 · Cited by 15
Comparison of EEG Pattern Recognition of Motor Imagery for Finger Movement Classification
Anam, K., Nuh, M., & Al-Jumaily, A. A. (2019) · Proceeding of the Electrical Engineering Computer Science and Informatics · doi:10.23919/eecsi48112.2019.8977037 · Cited by 15
Upper Limb Bionic Orthoses: General Overview and Forecasting Changes
Rzyman, G., Szkopek, J., Redlarski, G., & Pałkowski, A. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10155323 · Cited by 15
A Smart Home Control Prototype Using a P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface for Post-stroke Patients
Cortez, S. A., Flores, C., & Andreu-Pérez, J. (2020) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57566-3_13 · Cited by 15
Yue, J., Xiao, X., Wang, K., Yi, W., Jung, T., Xu, M., & Ming, D. (2025) · Cyborg and Bionic Systems · doi:10.34133/cbsystems.0379 · Cited by 22
“In recent years, researchers have proposed various deep learning models to enhance the efficiency of EEG signal decoding in BCI systems [ 10 ].”
Yadav, H., & Maini, S. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110937 · Cited by 16
Abdallah, I. B., Bouteraa, Y., & Alotaibi, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-24831-w · Cited by 14
“The extracted CSP features were classified using an SVM with a linear kernel, which has been shown to perform effectively for EEG-based binary classification problems 32 .”
Sayılgan, E., Yüce, Y. K., & İşler, Y. (2021) · Journal of Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.54856/jiswa.202105160 · Cited by 13
Tensor decomposition of human narrowband oscillatory brain activity in frequency, space and time
Rosipal, R., Rošťáková, Z., & Trejo, L. J. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108287 · Cited by 14
Data augmentation for Convolutional LSTM based brain computer interface system
Takahashi, K., Sun, Z., Solé‐Casals, J., Cichocki, A. S., Phan, A. H., Zhao, Q., Zhao, H., Deng, S., & Micheletto, R. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108811 · Cited by 15
Self-citationQian, L., Ge, X., Zhao, F., Wang, S., Yuan, J., Pan, Y., Shi, H., Xu, J., & Sun, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3242771 · Cited by 14
A spatial-temporal linear feature learning algorithm for P300-based brain-computer interfaces
Aghili, S. N., Kilani, S., Khushaba, R. N., & Rouhani, E. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15380 · Cited by 15
“However, these linear methods require a lot of features and a long calibration time to be accurate [30].”
BackgroundKilani, S., Aghili, S. N., & Hulea, M. G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13106283 · Cited by 14
SCALO: An Accelerator-Rich Distributed System for Scalable Brain-Computer Interfacing
Sriram, K., Pothukuchi, R. P., Gerasimiuk, M., Ugur, M., Ye, O., Manohar, R., Khandelwal, A., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2023) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Computer Architecture/Proceedings · doi:10.1145/3579371.3589107 · Cited by 14
“Linear SVMs are most commonly used for classification [34, 59, 70, 86, 116].”
BackgroundMethodSadras, N., Sani, O. G., Ahmadipour, P., & Shanechi, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/acec14 · Cited by 16
Liu, X., Sun, Y. Z., Zheng, D., & Na, R. (2023) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113673 · Cited by 15
Neural Correlation of EEG and Eye Movement in Natural Grasping Intention Estimation
Lin, C., Zhang, C., Xu, J., Liu, R., Leng, Y., & Fu, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3327907 · Cited by 14
“B RAIN-COMPUTER interface (BCI) creates a communication link between the human brain and external devices [1], [2], aiming to enhance intent perception in many applications.”
BackgroundRecognition of map activities using eye tracking and EEG data
Qin, T., Fias, W., de Weghe, N. V., & Huang, H. (2024) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658816.2024.2309188 · Cited by 18
“…map user trial and time window, we also extracted 8 types of EEG features (commonly used in previous EEG classification research (Wang et al. 2012; Lotte et al. 2018; Stancin et al. 2021)) to capture the characteristics of users’ brain activities during map use (See (Brouwer et al. 2013), reflect…”
MethodJuan, J. V., Martínez, R., Iáñez, E., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2024.1345425 · Cited by 14
TBEEG: A Two-Branch Manifold Domain Enhanced Transformer Algorithm for Learning EEG Decoding
Qin, Y., Zhang, W., & Tao, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2024.3380595 · Cited by 14
“Traditional algorithms such as support vector machine (SVM) [10], random forests [11], Bayesian classifiers [12], LDA [13] were used in EEG Decoding studies.”
MethodA systematic evaluation of Euclidean alignment with deep learning for EEG decoding
Junqueira, B. R. R. S. P., Aristimunha, B., Chevallier, S., & Camargo, R. Y. D. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad4f18 · Cited by 20
“But brain signals depend on the morphology and psychological state of the individual at the instant of the recording [27].”
Liu, C., & Huang, P.-T. (2024) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2024.102697 · Cited by 15
Hu, Y., Sun, L., Mao, X., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13214310 · Cited by 18
Sparse Ensemble Machine Learning to Improve Robustness of Long-Term Decoding in iBMIs
Shaikh, S., So, R. Q., Sibindi, T. M., Libedinsky, C., & Basu, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2019.2962708 · Cited by 13
Torres-Ramos, S., Salido-Ruiz, R. A., Espinoza-Valdez, A., et al. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227613 · Cited by 14
Detection of Tactile Feedback on Touch-screen Devices using EEG Data
Alsuradi, H., Pawar, C., Park, W., & Eid, M. A. (2020) · IEEE Haptics Symposium · doi:10.1109/haptics45997.2020.ras.hap20.16.8d90d0bd · Cited by 14
OCRNN: An orthogonal constrained recurrent neural network for sleep analysis based on EEG data
Zhu, F., & Liang, Q. (2020) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102178 · Cited by 14
Changoluisa, V., Varona, P., & Rodrı́guez, F. B. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3000187 · Cited by 15
Generalizability of EEG-based Mental Attention Modeling with Multiple Cognitive Tasks
Wai, A. A. P., Dou, M., & Guan, C. (2020) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176346 · Cited by 16
Fumanal-Idocin, J., Takáč, Z., Fernández, J., Sanz, J., Goyena, H., Lin, C., Wang, Y., & Bustince, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2021.3092824 · Cited by 14
Leerskov, K., Rehman, M. Z. U., Niazi, I., Crémoux, S., & Jochumsen, M. (2020) · International Conferences on Biological Information and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/bibe50027.2020.00072 · Cited by 13
Classification Methods for EEG Patterns of Imaginary Movements
Kapralov, N., Nagornova, Z. V., & Shemyakina, N. V. (2021) · Informatics and Automation · doi:10.15622/ia.2021.20.1.4 · Cited by 13
Abdulkarim, H., & Al-Faiz, M. Z. (2021) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v11i5.pp4016-4026 · Cited by 15
Amplitude-Phase Information Measurement on Riemannian Manifold for Motor Imagery-Based BCI
Huang, S., Cai, G., Wang, T., & Ma, T. (2021) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2021.3087099 · Cited by 15
Singh, S. A., Meitei, T. G., Devi, N. D., & Majumder, S. (2021) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-021-01057-4 · Cited by 14
Ferrero, L., Ortíz, M., Quiles, V., et al. (2021) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym13091746 · Cited by 14
Liu, S., Li, G., Jiang, S., Wu, X., Hu, J. Z., Zhang, D., & Chen, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.725384 · Cited by 16
A novel method to reduce the motor imagery BCI illiteracy
Wang, T., Du, S., & Dong, E. (2021) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-021-02449-0 · Cited by 14
Neural Decoding of Chinese Sign Language With Machine Learning for Brain–Computer Interfaces
Wang, P., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Huang, S., & Zhang, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3137340 · Cited by 16
Kshirsagar, G. B., & Londhe, N. D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2022.3156861 · Cited by 15
Imagined Speech Classification using EEG based Brain-Computer Interface
Pawar, D., & Dhage, S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT) · doi:10.1109/csnt54456.2022.9787644 · Cited by 14
Gannouni, S., Belwafi, K., Alsulmi, M., et al. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12070926 · Cited by 14
Multi-Source geometric metric transfer learning for EEG classification
Zhang, X., She, Q., Tan, T., Gao, Y., Ma, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2022.104435 · Cited by 14
Active poisoning: efficient backdoor attacks on transfer learning-based brain-computer interfaces
Jiang, X., Meng, L., Li, S., & Wu, D. (2023) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-022-3548-2 · Cited by 15
Email Phishing: An Enhanced Classification Model to Detect Malicious URLs
Sankhwar, S., Pandey, D., & Khan, R. (2019) · ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems · doi:10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.158529 · Cited by 14
Mousavi, M., & de Sa, V. R. (2019) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2019.1671040 · Cited by 14
Deep learning decoding of mental state in non-invasive brain computer interface
Zhang, D., Cao, D., & Chen, H. (2019) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Information Processing and Cloud Computing (AIIPCC) · doi:10.1145/3371425.3371441 · Cited by 16
Time-resolved estimation of strength of motor imagery representation by multivariate EEG decoding
Tidare, J., León, M., & Ästrand, E. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abd007 · Cited by 14
Lee, J., Park, K., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22124447 · Cited by 14
A Proposed LSTM‐Based Neuromarketing Model for Consumer Emotional State Evaluation Using EEG
Gill, R., & Singh, J. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119792437.ch8 · Cited by 15
Multiple entropy fusion predicts driver fatigue using forehead EEG
Yang, R., Zhang, L., Yang, R., Hou, L., Zhu, D., & Zhong, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1567146 · Cited by 13
Zakaria, T. M., Langi, A. Z. R., Nazaruddin, M. S., & Anshori, I. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3582805 · Cited by 17
Deep learning approaches for EEG-based healthcare applications: a comprehensive review
Lyu, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1689073 · Cited by 15
“…features are subsequently given as input to classical machine learning classifiers (e.g., support vector machines (SVMs), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), etc.) for seizures detection, sleep staging, motor imagery classifications and etc. (Lotte et al., 2018).”
Design and Optimization of a BCI-Driven Telepresence Robot Through Programming by Demonstration
Abibullaev, B., Zollanvari, A., Saduanov, B., et al. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2933268 · Cited by 13
Dynamic Weighted Filter Bank Domain Adaptation for Motor Imagery Brain–Computer Interfaces
Zhang, Y., Qiu, S., Wei, W., et al. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2022.3209801 · Cited by 13
Multi-information improves the performance of CCA-based SSVEP classification
Yin, X., & Lin, M. (2023) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-022-09923-x · Cited by 13
Selective Multi-Source Domain Adaptation Network for Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Discrimination
Lee, J., Choi, J. W., & Jo, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2023.3314351 · Cited by 13
“B RAIN-COMPUTER interfaces (BCIs) provide direct interaction between the human brain and external devices by decoding neural signals into control commands [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].”
BackgroundAssigning channel weights using an attention mechanism: an EEG interpolation algorithm
Liu, R., Wang, Z., Qiu, J., & Wang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1251677 · Cited by 15
“In recent years, there are more and more researchers applying machine learning techniques to EEG analysis (Lotte et al., 2018), including various applications such as fatigue detection in drivers (Zeng et al.”
BackgroundWang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Pan, Z., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106465 · Cited by 13
Vedernikov, A., Kumar, P., Chen, H., Seppänen, T., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00475 · Cited by 14
“Conventional methods for augmenting signal data often involve simplistic approaches like adding Gaussian noise, applying time-shifting, or altering the amplitude, either obscuring crucial features of the signal or failing to introduce meaningful diversity [23].”
Recognizing drivers’ turning intentions with EEG and eye movement
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Liang, X., et al. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107218 · Cited by 13
EEG in Education: A Scoping Review of Hardware, Software, and Methodological Aspects
Orovas, C., Sapounidis, T., Volioti, C., & Keramopoulos, E. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25010182 · Cited by 22
“The study of the characteristics of brain waves and their distribution on the scalp has created a link between them and specific states of The degree of correlation or synchronization among signals from di ff erent electrodes can be a measurement of connectivity pa tt erns [15]. mind.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
- GIPSA-Lab (FR)
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes (FR)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lotte, F
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 031005
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2794345050
- Cited by
- 2,239
- References
- 266
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 284 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 283 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 321 · 2020: 273 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 49
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Polish National Science Center (2016/20/W/N24/00354)
- Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (14.756.31.0001)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE23-0013-01)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2016-STG-714567)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- EEG-based brain-computer interface, EEG classification, machine learning classifiers, adaptive classifier, unsupervised adaptation, transfer learning, deep learning, Riemannian geometry, random forest, small training samples
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review