The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 266 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: a 10 year update
Open accessAbstract
Objective . Most current electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) are based on machine learning algorithms. There is a large diversity of classifier types that are used in this field, as described in our 2007 review paper. Now, approximately ten years after this review publication, many new algorithms have been developed and tested to classify EEG signals in BCIs. The time is therefore ripe for an updated review of EEG classification algorithms for BCIs. Approach . We surveyed the BCI and machine learning literature from 2007 to 2017 to identify the new classification approaches that have been investigated to design BCIs. We synthesize these studies in order to present such algorithms, to report how they were used for BCIs, what were the outcomes, and to identify their pros and cons. Main results . We found that the recently designed classification algorithms for EEG-based BCIs can be divided into four main categories: adaptive classifiers, matrix and tensor classifiers, transfer learning and deep learning, plus a few other miscellaneous classifiers. Among these, adaptive classifiers were demonstrated to be generally superior to static ones, even with unsupervised adaptation. Transfer learning can also prove useful although the benefits of transfer learning remain unpredictable. Riemannian geometry-based methods have reached state-of-the-art performances on multiple BCI problems and deserve to be explored more thoroughly, along with tensor-based methods. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis and random forests also appear particularly useful for small training samples settings. On the other hand, deep learning methods have not yet shown convincing improvement over state-of-the-art BCI methods. Significance . This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the modern classification algorithms used in EEG-based BCIs, presents the principles of these methods and guidelines on when and how to use them. It also identifies a number of challenges to further advance EEG classification in BCI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“If the data dimension is too large, the Riemannian Geometry method will perform many calculations, which is time-consuming and causes statistical deviations [22].”
From Transfer Learning Algorithm of P300-EEG Signal Based on XDAWN Spatial Filter and Riemannian Geometry Classifier (2020) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“xDAWN spatial filtering [13] with Riemannian geometry (xDAWN+RG) features also perform well cross-subject [14], [15] but lack obvious physiological interpretation [8].”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“General-purpose deep learning architectures such as EEGNet [6], [7], [8] have been evaluated across multiple BCI paradigms”
From ERP-XTTN: interpretable prototype-guided cross-attention for cross-subject ERP classification (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Book Review: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
Nasrabadi, N. M. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2819119 · Cited by 22,066
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
GAN(Generative Adversarial Nets)
淳司, 柴. (2017) · Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.3156/jsoft.29.5_177_2 · Cited by 20,507
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Allwein, 2001, Reducing multiclass to binary: A unifying approach for margin classifiers, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 1, 113
- Chevallier, 2018, Riemannian classification for SSVEP-based BCI, 10.1201/9781351231954-19 · DOI
- Guyon, 2003, An introduction to variable and feature selection, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 1157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Towards Adaptive Classification using Riemannian Geometry approaches in Brain-Computer Interfaces
Kumar, S., Yger, F., & Lotte, F. (2019) · International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) · doi:10.1109/iww-bci.2019.8737349 · Cited by 51
Self-citationIndividualized pattern recognition for detecting mind wandering from EEG during live lectures
Dhindsa, K., Acai, A., Wagner, N., Bosynak, D., Kelly, S., Bhandari, M., Petrisor, B. A., & Sonnadara, R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222276 · Cited by 54
Komolovaitė, D., Maskeliūnas, R., & Damaševičius, R. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12030374 · Cited by 56
Hybrid Emotion-Aware Monitoring System Based on Brainwaves for Internet of Medical Things
Meng, W., Cai, Y. H., Yang, L. T., et al. (2021) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3079461 · Cited by 51
Kabir, M. H., Mahmood, S., Shiam, A. A., et al. (2023) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math11081921 · Cited by 51
Network-based brain–computer interfaces: principles and applications
Gonzalez-Astudillo, J., Cattai, T., Bassignana, G., Corsi, M., & Fallani, F. D. V. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abc760 · Cited by 60
A binary harmony search algorithm as channel selection method for motor imagery-based BCI
Shi, B., Wang, Q., Yin, S., Yue, Z., Huai, Y., & Wang, J. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.051 · Cited by 49
Zhao, C., Ju, F., Sun, W., Jiang, S., Xiao, X., Wang, H., Sun, X., Li, M., Xie, J., Zhang, K., et al. (2022) · Neurology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40120-022-00333-z · Cited by 52
Kinney‐Lang, E., Kelly, D., Floreani, E. D., Jadavji, Z., Rowley, D., Zewdie, E., Anaraki, J. R., Bahari, H., Beckers, K., Castelane, K., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.593883 · Cited by 52
Improving EEG Decoding via Clustering-Based Multitask Feature Learning
Zhang, Y., Zhou, T., Wu, W., Xie, H., Zhu, H., Zhou, G., & Cichocki, A. S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3053576 · Cited by 52
Self-citationDiverse beta burst waveform motifs characterize movement-related cortical dynamics
Szul, M. J., Papadopoulos, S., Alavizadeh, S., Daligaut, S., Schwartz, D., Mattout, J., & Bonaiuto, J. J. (2023) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102490 · Cited by 51
Değirmenci, M., Yüce, Y. K., Perc, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1223307 · Cited by 49
“The data placed on different parts of the hyperplane are indicated as a component of a different class (Vapnik, 1999; Hart et al., 2000; Lotte et al., 2018).”
BackgroundEmotion Detection from EEG Signals Using Machine Deep Learning Models
Fernandes, J. V. M. R., de Alexandria, A. R., Marques, J. A. L., de Assis, D. F., Motta, P. C., & Silva, B. R. D. S. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11080782 · Cited by 50
“Despite the abovementioned challenges in obtaining such data, several public and private datasets have been instrumental in advancing the field [23].”
BackgroundUsing Brain Network Features to Increase the Classification Accuracy of MI-BCI Inefficiency Subject
Zhang, R., Li, X., Wang, Y., Liu, B., Shi, L., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Hu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917327 · Cited by 49
Large effects of brief meditation intervention on EEG spectra in meditation novices
Stapleton, P., Dispenza, J., McGill, S., Sabot, D., Peach, M., & Raynor, D. (2020) · IBRO Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ibror.2020.10.006 · Cited by 56
Zhang, R., Li, F., Zhang, T., Yao, D., & Xu, P. (2020) · Brain Science Advances · doi:10.26599/bsa.2020.9050021 · Cited by 55
State of the Art of Non-Invasive Electrode Materials for Brain–Computer Interface
Yuan, H., Li, Y., Yang, J., Li, H., Yang, Q.-Y., Guo, C., Zhu, S., & Shu, X. (2021) · Micromachines · doi:10.3390/mi12121521 · Cited by 51
Ju, C., & Guan, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3307470 · Cited by 48
Vavoulis, A., Figueiredo, P., & Vourvopoulos, A. (2023) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals4010004 · Cited by 55
Chiossi, F., Ou, C., Gerhardt, C., Putze, F., & Mayer, S. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103433 · Cited by 48
A conceptual space for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Kosmyna, N., & Lécuyer, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210145 · Cited by 50
Schneider, T., Wang, X., Hersche, M., Cavigelli, L., & Benini, L. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing · doi:10.1109/smartcomp50058.2020.00065 · Cited by 48
Recent advances and current trends in brain‐computer interface research and their applications
Žabčíková, M., Koudelková, Z., Jašek, R., & Lorenzo-Navarro, J. (2021) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1002/jdn.10166 · Cited by 50
Convolutional Neural Networks for Epileptic Seizure Prediction
Eberlein, M., Hildebrand, R., Tetzlaff, R., Hoffmann, N., Kuhlmann, L., Brinkmann, B. H., & Müller, J. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2018.8621225 · Cited by 49
Sub-band target alignment common spatial pattern in brain-computer interface
Zhang, X., She, Q., Chen, Y., Kong, W., & Mei, C. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106150 · Cited by 47
Kosch, T., Funk, M., Schmidt, A., & Chuang, L. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3229093 · Cited by 46
Using EEG to Distinguish Between Writing and Typing for the Same Cognitive Task
Qu, X., Mei, Q., Liu, P., & Hickey, T. J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_7 · Cited by 45
Effect of deactivation of activity patterns related to smoking cue reactivity on nicotine addiction
Bu, J., Young, K. D., Hong, W., Ma, R., Song, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Hampson, M., Hendler, T., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awz114 · Cited by 43
Fadel, W., Köllőd, C. M., Wahdow, M., Ibrahim, Y., & Ulbert, I. (2020) · International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) · doi:10.1109/bci48061.2020.9061622 · Cited by 45
Feature subset and time segment selection for the classification of EEG data based motor imagery
Wang, J., Feng, Z., Ren, X., Lü, N., Luo, J., & Sun, L. (2020) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102026 · Cited by 45
PhyDAA: Physiological Dataset Assessing Attention
Delvigne, V., Wannous, H., Dutoit, T., Ris, L., & Vandeborre, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2021.3061719 · Cited by 47
Early classification of motor tasks using dynamic functional connectivity graphs from EEG
Shamsi, F., Haddad, A., & Najafizadeh, L. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abce70 · Cited by 45
Measuring the cognitive load of software developers: An extended Systematic Mapping Study
Gonçales, L. J., Farias, K., & da Silva, B. C. (2021) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106563 · Cited by 47
A Cross-Space CNN With Customized Characteristics for Motor Imagery EEG Classification
Hu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Dai, B., Peng, B., Yang, H., & Dai, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3249831 · Cited by 45
“Support vector machine (SVM) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) are recognized as the most commonly used classifiers to handle the mentioned above features [37].”
BackgroundRobust learning from corrupted EEG with dynamic spatial filtering
Banville, H. J., Wood, S. U. N., Aimone, C., Engemann, D. A., & Gramfort, A. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118994 · Cited by 45
Li, M., Han, J.-F., & Yang, J. (2021) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-021-02396-w · Cited by 44
Architecture, biometrics, and virtual environments triangulation: a research review
Mostafavi, A. (2021) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2021.2008300 · Cited by 52
Said, R. R., Heyat, M. B. B., Song, K., Tian, C., & Wu, Z. (2022) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios12121134 · Cited by 40
Jiménez-Guarneros, M., & Gómez‐Gil, P. (2020) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2020.11.013 · Cited by 44
Experimenters' Influence on Mental-Imagery based Brain-Computer Interface User Training
Pillette, L., Roc, A., N’Kaoua, B., & Lotte, F. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102603 · Cited by 44
Self-citationRashid, M., Bari, B. S., Hasan, M. J., Razman, M. A. M., Musa, R. M., Nasir, A. F. A., & Majeed, A. P. P. A. (2021) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.374 · Cited by 42
Huang, E., Zheng, X., Fang, Y., et al. (2021) · IRBM · doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2021.04.004 · Cited by 44
A generic noninvasive neuromotor interface for human-computer interactionPreprint
Labs, C.-L. A. R., Sussillo, D., Kaifosh, P., & Reardon, T. R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581779 · Cited by 44
CTNN: A Convolutional Tensor-Train Neural Network for Multi-Task Brainprint Recognition
Jin, X., Tang, J., Kong, X., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2020.3035786 · Cited by 43
Hou, Y., Jia, S., Lun, X., Zhang, S., Chen, T., Wang, F., & Lv, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.706229 · Cited by 86
Pillette, L., Lotte, F., N’Kaoua, B., Joseph, P., Jeunet, C., & Glize, B. (2020) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102417 · Cited by 43
Self-citationVega, C. F., Quevedo, J., Escandón, E. R., Kiani, M., Ding, W., & Andreu-Pérez, J. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108359 · Cited by 42
Rotaru, I., Geirnaert, S., Heintz, N., de Ryck, I. V., Bertrand, A., & Francart, T. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad2214 · Cited by 43
“Fisher’s LDA is traditionally used in combination with CSP filters (Lotte et al 2018).”
FMLAN: A novel framework for cross-subject and cross-session EEG emotion recognition
Yu, P., He, X., Li, H., Dou, H., Tan, Y., Wu, H., & Chen, B. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106912 · Cited by 44
A novel method for classification of multi-class motor imagery tasks based on feature fusion
Hou, Y., Chen, T., Lun, X., et al. (2021) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2021.09.002 · Cited by 42
Effect of power feature covariance shift on BCI spatial-filtering techniques: A comparative study
Miladinović, A., Ajčević, M., Jarmolowska, J., Marušič, U., Colussi, M., Silveri, G., Battaglini, P. P., & Accardo, A. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105808 · Cited by 41
Spatio-Temporal EEG Representation Learning on Riemannian Manifold and Euclidean Space
Zhang, G., & Etemad, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2023.3332549 · Cited by 47
A Comprehensive Survey of EEG Preprocessing Methods for Cognitive Load Assessment
Kyriaki, K., Koukopoulos, D. K., & Fidas, C. A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3360328 · Cited by 52
Beauchemin, N., Charland, P., Karran, A. J., Boasen, J., Tadson, B., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1416683 · Cited by 53
Gumpy: a Python toolbox suitable for hybrid brain–computer interfaces
Tayeb, Z., Waniek, N., Fedjaev, J., Ghaboosi, N., Rychly, L., Widderich, C., Richter, C., Braun, J., Saveriano, M., Cheng, G., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aae186 · Cited by 42
A review of recent trends in EEG based Brain-Computer Interface
Lahane, P., Jagtap, J., Inamdar, A., Karne, N., & Dev, R. (2019) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Data Science (ICCIDS) · doi:10.1109/iccids.2019.8862054 · Cited by 41
Brain-Computer Interface Speller System for Alternative Communication: A Review
Kundu, S., & Ari, S. (2021) · IRBM · doi:10.1016/j.irbm.2021.07.001 · Cited by 42
Practical real-time MEG-based neural interfacing with optically pumped magnetometers
Wittevrongel, B., Holmes, N., Boto, E., Hill, R. M., Rea, M., Libert, A., Khachatryan, E., Hulle, M. M. V., Bowtell, R. W., & Brookes, M. J. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01073-6 · Cited by 47
Roy, R. N., Hinss, M. F., Darmet, L., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2022.838342 · Cited by 41
Self-citationEvaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of EEG Signals
Ramírez-Arias, F. J., García-Guerrero, E. E., Tlelo‐Cuautle, E., Colores-Vargas, J. M., García–Canseco, E., López-Bonilla, O. R., Galindo-Aldana, G., & Inzunza-González, E. (2022) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies10040079 · Cited by 49
Gao, C., Liu, W., & Yang, X. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.08.024 · Cited by 41
A Critical Survey of EEG-Based BCI Systems for Applications in Industrial Internet of Things
Ajmeria, R., Mondal, M., Banerjee, R., Halder, T., Deb, P. K., Mishra, D., Nayak, P., Misra, S., Pal, S. K., & Chakravarty, D. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3232576 · Cited by 28
The Riemannian Potato Field: A Tool for Online Signal Quality Index of EEG
Barthélemy, Q., Mayaud, L., Ojeda, D., & Congedo, M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2019.2893113 · Cited by 39
Self-citationTaheri, S., Ezoji, M., & Sakhaei, S. M. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2378-z · Cited by 40
CNN With Large Data Achieves True Zero-Training in Online P300 Brain-Computer Interface
Lee, J., Won, K., Kwon, M., Jun, S. C., & Ahn, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988057 · Cited by 40
MIEEG-GAN: Generating Artificial Motor Imagery Electroencephalography Signals
Roy, S., Dora, S., McCreadie, K. A., & Prasad, G. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206942 · Cited by 40
EEG signal classification based on SVM with improved squirrel search algorithm
Shi, M., Wang, C., Li, X., Li, M.-Q., Wang, L., & Xie, N. (2020) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2020-0038 · Cited by 44
A novel multi-scale convolutional neural network for motor imagery classification
Riyad, M., Khalil, M., & Adib, A. (2021) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102747 · Cited by 39
Borra, D., Magosso, E., Castelo-Branco, M. S., & Simões, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac7908 · Cited by 41
Franc, S. L., Altamira, G. H., Guillen, M., Butet, S., Fleck, S., Lécuyer, A., Bougrain, L., & Bonan, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.917909 · Cited by 39
Self-citationLiu, W., Guo, C., & Gao, C. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121612 · Cited by 40
MEET: A Multi-Band EEG Transformer for Brain States Decoding
Shi, E., Yu, S., Kang, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Lv, J., Liu, T., Hu, X., & Zhang, S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2023.3339892 · Cited by 43
Mental Workload Assessment Using Deep Learning Models From EEG Signals: A Systematic Review
Kingphai, K., & Moshfeghi, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2024.3460750 · Cited by 49
“Considerable progress has been made in this fi eld as a result of previous notable review articles [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41].”
Portable brain-computer interface based on novel convolutional neural network
Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, H., Fan, Z., & Zhong, X. (2019) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.02.023 · Cited by 39
Gao, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, E., Song, X., & Song, Y. (2019) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2019/2361282 · Cited by 40
Functional disconnection of associative cortical areas predicts performance during BCI training
Corsi, M., Chávez, M., Schwartz, D., George, N., Hugueville, L., Kahn, A. E., Dupont, S., Bassett, D. S., & Fallani, F. D. V. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116500 · Cited by 43
Grand Challenges in Neurotechnology and System Neuroergonomics
Fairclough, S. H., & Lotte, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2020.602504 · Cited by 49
Self-citationChen, D., Huang, H., Bao, X., Pan, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1194554 · Cited by 38
“RF classifiers have been shown to be highly effective in small EEG data sets as demonstrated by the studies conducted by Amin et al. (2017), Lotte et al. (2018).”
MethodZhang, Y., Li, Q., Nahata, S., Jamal, T., Cheng, S.-K., Cauwenberghs, G., & Jung, T. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2024.3435460 · Cited by 56
“Generally, Discriminant Analysis and SVMs are frequently used as non-neural network classifiers in BCI [41].”
MethodMulti optimized SVM classifiers for motor imagery left and right hand movement identification
Mebarkia, K., & Reffad, A. (2019) · Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-019-00793-y · Cited by 38
Reddy, T. K., Arora, V., Kumar, S., et al. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2018.2881229 · Cited by 38
Raza, H., Chowdhury, A., Bhattacharyya, S., & Samothrakis, S. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9207100 · Cited by 38
Convolutional Neural Networks for Epileptic Seizure Prediction
Eberlein, M., Hildebrand, R., Tetzlaff, R., Hoffmann, N., Kuhlmann, L., Brinkmann, B. H., & Müller, J. (2018) · Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) · Cited by 41
Deep Learning-Based Classification of Fine Hand Movements from Low Frequency EEG
Bressan, G., Cisotto, G., Müller-Putz, G., & Wriessnegger, S. C. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13050103 · Cited by 41
Ge, S., Jiang, Y., Zhang, M., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3073134 · Cited by 38
Gutiérrez-Martínez, J., Mercado-Gutierrez, J. A., Carvajal-Gámez, B. E., Rosas‐Trigueros, J. L., & Contreras-Martinez, A. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.772837 · Cited by 41
Automatic drowsiness detection for safety-critical operations using ensemble models and EEG signals
Ramos, P. M. S., Maior, C. B. S., Moura, M. D. C., & Lins, I. D. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.039 · Cited by 38
Analysis and classification of hybrid BCI based on motor imagery and speech imagery
Wang, L., Liu, X., Liang, Z., Yang, Z., & Hu, X. (2019) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.070 · Cited by 37
Yang, Y., Gao, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abfa71 · Cited by 37
Hardware Acceleration of EEG-Based Emotion Classification Systems: A Comprehensive Survey
Gonzalez, H. A., George, R., Muzaffar, S., Acevedo, J., Höppner, S., Mayr, C., Yoo, J., Fitzek, F. H. P., & Elfadel, I. M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2021.3089132 · Cited by 39
Design a Novel BCI for Neurorehabilitation Using Concurrent LFP and EEG Features: A Case Study
Feng, Z., Sun, Y., Qian, L., Qi, Y., Wang, Y., Guan, C., & Sun, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3115799 · Cited by 37
Khalil, K., Asgher, U., & Ayaz, Y. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06805-4 · Cited by 40
Yasemin, M., Cruz, A., Nunes, U., & Pires, G. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/acabe9 · Cited by 36
A discriminative SPD feature learning approach on Riemannian manifolds for EEG classification
Kim, B. H., Choi, J. W., Lee, H., & Jo, S. (2023) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109751 · Cited by 36
Signal Processing for Brain–Computer Interfaces: A review and current perspectives
Wu, L., Liu, A., Ward, R. K., Wang, Z. J., & Chen, X. (2023) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2023.3278074 · Cited by 36
“Lotte et al. [53] suggested using three classifiers—a shrinkage LDA classifier, random forest, and Riemannian classifier—when confronted with scarce training samples.”
MethodEEG Signal Processing in MI-BCI Applications With Improved Covariance Matrix Estimators
Olias, J., Martı́n-Clemente, R., Sarmiento, A., & Cruces, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2019.2905894 · Cited by 36
EEG Representation in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Classification of Motor Imagery
Robinson, N., Lee, S., & Guan, C. (2019) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2019.8914184 · Cited by 36
Liang, Y., & Ma, Y. (2020) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102101 · Cited by 36
A few filters are enough: Convolutional neural network for P300 detection
Alvarado-González, M., Fuentes-Pineda, G., & Cervantes‐Ojeda, J. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.10.104 · Cited by 37
A review of EEG acquisition, processing and application
Li, B., Cheng, T., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1907/1/012045 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotte, F., Bougrain, L., Cichocki, A., Clerc, M., Congedo, M., Rakotomamonjy, A., & Yger, F.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
- GIPSA-Lab (FR)
- Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes (FR)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lotte, F
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 031005
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2794345050
- Cited by
- 2,239
- References
- 266
- Citations by year
- 2026: 320 · 2025: 284 · 2024: 262 · 2023: 283 · 2022: 276 · 2021: 321 · 2020: 273 · 2019: 170 · 2018: 49
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Base Institutionnelle de Recherche de l'université Paris-Dauphine (BIRD) (University Paris-Dauphine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Polish National Science Center (2016/20/W/N24/00354)
- Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (14.756.31.0001)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-15-CE23-0013-01)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2016-STG-714567)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- EEG-based brain-computer interface, EEG classification, machine learning classifiers, adaptive classifier, unsupervised adaptation, transfer learning, deep learning, Riemannian geometry, random forest, small training samples
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review