Cited by 128EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFree Will and Agency

Detection and classification of movement-related cortical potentials associated with task force and speed

Open access
Jochumsen, Mads, Niazi, Imran Khan, Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie, Farina, Dario, Dremstrup, Kim·2013·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the objective was to detect movement intentions and extract different levels of force and speed of the intended movement from scalp electroencephalography (EEG). We then estimated the performance of the closed loop system. APPROACH: Cued movements were detected from continuous EEG recordings using a template of the initial phase of the movement-related cortical potential in 12 healthy subjects. The temporal features, extracted from the movement intention, were classified with an optimized support vector machine. The system performance was evaluated when combining detection with classification. MAIN RESULTS: The system detected 81% of the movements and correctly classified 75 ± 9% and 80 ± 10% of these at the point of detection when varying the force and speed, respectively. When the detector was combined with the classifier, the system detected and correctly classified 64 ± 13% and 67 ± 13% of these movements. The system detected and incorrectly classified 21 ± 7% and 16 ± 9% of the movements. The movements were detected 317 ± 73 ms before the movement onset. SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that it is possible to detect movement intentions with limited latencies, and extract and classify different levels of force and speed, which may be combined with assistive technologies for patient-driven neurorehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056015

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jochumsen, M., Niazi, I. K., Mrachacz-Kersting, N., Farina, D., & Dremstrup, K.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Jochumsen, Mads
  • Niazi, Imran Khan
  • Farina, Dario
  • Dremstrup, Kim
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
056015
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2087711998
Cited by
128
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Teknologi og Produktion, Det Frie Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
movement-related cortical potentials, motion intention recognition, EEG-based brain-computer interface, support vector machine, closed-loop systems, assistive technology, neurorehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Muscle Contraction, Perception, ROC Curve, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review