The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials
Open accessAbstract
Demonstrating the production of net electricity and operating with a closed fuel-cycle remain unarguably the crucial steps towards the exploitation of fusion power. These are the aims of a demonstration fusion reactor (DEMO) proposed to be built after ITER. This paper briefly describes the DEMO design options that are being considered in Europe for the current conceptual design studies as part of the Roadmap to Fusion Electricity Horizon 2020. These are not intended to represent fixed and exclusive design choices but rather 'proxies' of possible plant design options to be used to identify generic design/material issues that need to be resolved in future fusion reactor systems. The materials nuclear design requirements and the effects of radiation damage are briefly analysed with emphasis on a pulsed 'low extrapolation' system, which is being used for the initial design integration studies, based as far as possible on mature technologies and reliable regimes of operation (to be extrapolated from the ITER experience), and on the use of materials suitable for the expected level of neutron fluence. The main technical issues arising from the plasma and nuclear loads and the effects of radiation damage particularly on the structural and heat sink materials of the vessel and in-vessel components are critically discussed. The need to establish realistic target performance and a development schedule for near-term electricity production tends to favour more conservative technology choices. The readiness of the technical (physics and technology) assumptions that are being made is expected to be an important factor for the selection of the technical features of the device.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concept design of CFETR tokamak machine
Song, Y. T., Wu, S. T., Li, J. G., Wan, B. N., Wan, Y. X., Fu, P., Ye, M. Y., Zheng, J. X., Lu, K., Gao, X., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/tps.2014.2299277 · Cited by 374
Cited by
An overview of the EU breeding blanket design strategy as an integral part of the DEMO design effort
Federici, G., Boccaccini, L., Cismondi, F., Gasparotto, M., Poitevin, Y., & Ricapito, I. (2019) · Fusion Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.01.141 · Cited by 282
Self-citationThe thermal conductivity of defected copper at finite temperatures
Ye, X. B., He, Z. H., & Pan, B. C. (2020) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-019-04267-0 · Cited by 7
Thermal diffusivity, microstructure and nanohardness of laser-welded proton-irradiated Eurofer97
Wylie, A. P. C., Reza, A., Harrison, G., Taylor, M., Dacus, B. R., Hofmann, F., Short, M. P., Kirk, S., Preuss, M., & Pickering, E. J. (2023) · Journal of Nuclear Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154661 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Federici, G., Biel, W., Gilbert, M. R., Kemp, R., Taylor, N., & Wenninger, R.
- Venue
- Nuclear Fusion
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-06-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 092002
- ISSN
- 0029-5515 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4326
- OpenAlex
- W2622223905
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1741-4326/57/9/092002
- The paper
- Federici, G., Biel, W., Gilbert, M. R., Kemp, R., Taylor, N., & Wenninger, R. (2017). European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials. Nuclear Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/57/9/092002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.