Cited by 374Magnetic confinement fusion researchSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFusion materials and technologies

Concept design of CFETR tokamak machine

Song, Yun Tao, Wu, Song Tao, Li, Jian Gang, Wan, Bao Nian, Wan, Yuan Xi, Fu, Peng, Ye, Min You, Zheng, Jin Xing +7 more·2014·IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

Abstract

China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) is a tokamak reactor; one design option under the consideration of the China National Integration Design Group employs superconducting magnets. The fusion power is at the range of 50–200 MW and the duty cycle (or burning time) was envisioned as 30%–50%. The plasma current will be 10 MA and the major and minor radii are 5.7 and 1.6 m, respectively. The concept engineering design including the magnet system, vacuum vessel (VV) system, and maintenance method has been carried out in the past years. The toroidal magnetic field strength at$R_{0}$is 5 T and the maximum flux swing provided by central solenoid winding will be 160 VS. The main design work, including the electromagnetic analysis of the magnet system, has already been carried out. This paper mainly probes into the VV design and optimization based on three types of maintenance ports. Furthermore, the maintenance method, counted as one of the most important design studies, is presented specifically in this paper. It includes the design of the maintenance ports and the remote handling system design, and so on. The next design stage will mainly include mechanical design, conductor stability, different types of divertor system design, and so on.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tps.2014.2299277

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • China, the EU, and Japan have carried out studies on DEMO, and the engineering design of the Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor was completed in 2021.

    “China,82 the EU,83 and Japan84 have carried out their studies on DEMO, and the engineering design of the Chinese Fusion Engineering Testing Reactor was completed in 2021.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, Y. T., Wu, S. T., Li, J. G., Wan, B. N., Wan, Y. X., Fu, P., Ye, M. Y., Zheng, J. X., Lu, K., Gao, X., Liu, S. M., Liu, X. F., Lei, M. Z., Peng, X. B., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Published
2014-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
503-509
ISSN
  • 0093-3813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9375
OpenAlex
W2128350346
Cited by
374
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Superconducting Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
Keywords
CFETR, tokamak reactor, vacuum vessel design, remote handling system, superconducting magnets, electromagnetic analysis, toroidal magnetic field, central solenoid, fusion reactor maintenance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review