Cited by 493D Printing in Biomedical ResearchBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioglass incorporated methacrylated collagen bioactive ink for 3D printing of bone tissue

Open access

Abstract

Bioactive three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffolds are promising candidates for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications. Here, we introduce a bioactive ink composed of Bioglass 45S5 (BG) and methacrylated collagen (CMA) for 3D printing of biomimetic constructs that resemble the organic and inorganic composition of native bone tissue. A uniform dispersion of BG particles within the collagen network improved stability and reduced swelling of collagen hydrogels. Rheological testing showed significant improvement in the yield stress and percent recovery of 3D printed constructs upon BG incorporation. Further, addition of BG improved the bone bioactivity of 3D printed constructs in stimulated body fluid. BG incorporated CMA (BG-CMA) constructs maintained high cell viability and enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity of human mesenchymal stem cells. In addition, cell-mediated calcium deposition was significantly higher on BG-CMA constructs, compared to CMA alone. In conclusion, 3D printed BG-CMA constructs have significant potential for use in BTE applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-605x/abc744

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kajave, N. S., Schmitt, T., Nguyen, T.-U., Gaharwar, A. K., & Kishore, V.
Affiliations
  • Florida Institute of Technology (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Kishore, Vipuil
Venue
Biomedical Materials
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
035003
ISSN
  • 1748-6041 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-605X
OpenAlex
W3096856907
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomedical Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Center for Scientific Review (1R15AR071102)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Keywords
45S5 bioactive glass, 3D bioprinting, bone tissue engineering, collagen gel, rheological properties, mesenchymal stem cells, alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium deposition
MeSH terms
Bone and Bones, Ceramics, Collagen, Humans, Ink, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review