CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 173Climate Change and GeoengineeringAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems

Open access
McClellan, Justin, Keith, David W, Apt, Jay·2012·Environmental Research Letters
DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034019
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We perform engineering cost analyses of systems capable of delivering 1–5 million metric tonnes (Mt) of albedo modification material to altitudes of 18–30 km. The goal is to compare a range of delivery systems evaluated on a consistent cost basis. Cost estimates are developed with statistical cost estimating relationships based on historical costs of aerospace development programs and operations concepts using labor rates appropriate to the operations. We evaluate existing aircraft cost of acquisition and operations, perform in-depth new aircraft and airship design studies and cost analyses, and survey rockets, guns, and suspended gas and slurry pipes, comparing their costs to those of aircraft and airships. Annual costs for delivery systems based on new aircraft designs are estimated to be $1–3B to deliver 1 Mt to 20–30 km or $2–8B to deliver 5 Mt to the same altitude range. Costs for hybrid airships may be competitive, but their large surface area complicates operations in high altitude wind shear, and development costs are more uncertain than those for airplanes. Pipes suspended by floating platforms provide low recurring costs to pump a liquid or gas to altitudes as high as ∼ 20 km, but the research, development, testing and evaluation costs of these systems are high and carry a large uncertainty; the pipe system's high operating pressures and tensile strength requirements bring the feasibility of this system into question. The costs for rockets and guns are significantly higher than those for other systems. We conclude that (a) the basic technological capability to deliver material to the stratosphere at million tonne per year rates exists today, (b) based on prior literature, a few million tonnes per year would be sufficient to alter radiative forcing by an amount roughly equivalent to the growth of anticipated greenhouse gas forcing over the next half century, and that (c) several different methods could possibly deliver this quantity for less than $8B per year. We do not address here the science of aerosols in the stratosphere, nor issues of risk, effectiveness or governance that will add to the costs of solar geoengineering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034019

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2009, The Stratospheric Shield: A Practical, Low-Cost Way to Reverse Catastrophic Warming of the Arctic—Or the Entire Planet
  2. Moreno-Cruz J B, 2012, Clim. Change
  3. 1992, Policy Implications of Greeenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base
  4. Victor D G, 2009, Foreign Affairs, 88, 64

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–171 of 171

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
McClellan, J., Keith, D. W., & Apt, J.
Affiliations
  • Aurora Flight Sciences (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Apt, Jay
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
034019
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034019
OpenAlex
W2163385304
Cited by
173
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
solar geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection, albedo modification, delivery systems, cost analysis, aircraft, airships, hybrid airship, rockets, firearms, floating platforms, cost estimating relationships, radiative forcing, greenhouse gas forcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review