The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scenario analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a new residential area
Open accessAbstract
While buildings are often credited as accounting for some 40% of the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the construction phase is typically assumed to account for only around one tenth of the overall emissions. However, the relative importance of construction phase emissions is quickly increasing as the energy efficiency of buildings increases. In addition, the significance of construction may actually be much higher when the temporal perspective of the emissions is taken into account. The construction phase carbon spike, i.e. high GHG emissions in a short time associated with the beginning of the building's life cycle, may be high enough to question whether new construction, no matter how energy efficient the buildings are, can contribute to reaching the greenhouse gas mitigation goals of the near future. Furthermore, the construction of energy efficient buildings causes more GHG emissions than the construction of conventional buildings. On the other hand, renovating the current building stock together with making energy efficiency improvements might lead to a smaller construction phase carbon spike and still to the same reduced energy consumption in the use phase as the new energy efficient buildings. The study uses a new residential development project in Northern Europe to assess the overall life cycle GHG emissions of a new residential area and to evaluate the influence of including the temporal allocation of the life cycle GHG emissions in the assessment. In the study, buildings with different energy efficiency levels are compared with a similar hypothetical area of buildings of the average existing building stock, as well as with a renovation of an area with average buildings from the 1960s. The GHG emissions are modeled with a hybrid life cycle assessment. The study suggests that the carbon payback time of constructing new residential areas is several decades long even when using very energy efficient buildings compared to utilizing the current building stock. Thus, while increasing the overall energy efficiency is important in the long term, the construction of new energy efficient buildings cannot be used as a means to achieve the short term and medium term climate change mitigation goals as cities and governments often suggest. Furthermore, given the magnitude of the carbon spike from construction and its implications, the climate change mitigation strategies should set reduction targets for the construction phase emissions alongside the ones for the use phase, which currently receives almost all of the attention from policy-makers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In light of medium-term climate targets and the carbon spike produced with new construction, this research shows that building new runs counter to climate targets (Säynäjoki et al. 2012).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Säynäjoki et al. 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A study of a new conventional residential development in Finland revealed that over the 50-year time horizon relevant to climate targets, the emissions from a comparable renovation were 35% lower.”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Säynäjoki et al. 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Edenhofer, O., & Seyboth, K. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375067-9.00128-5 · Cited by 3,705
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article
Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,284
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment
Reap, J., Román, F., Duncan, S. J., & Bras, B. (2008) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x · Cited by 1,009
Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments
Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Deschênes, L., & Samson, R. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9030003 · Cited by 731 · cited 2×
“For example, Levasseur et al argue for the importance of the temporal aspect in life cycle assessments [22].”
BackgroundMethodA survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment
Reap, J., Román, F., Duncan, S. J., & Bras, B. (2008) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0009-9 · Cited by 704
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach
Hendrickson, C. T. (2006) · Cited by 643
Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA
Huijbregts, M. A. J. (1998) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02979835 · Cited by 599
Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains
Chester, M. V., & Horvath, A. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008 · Cited by 592
Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland
Asif, M., Muneer, T., & Kelley, R. (2006) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.023 · Cited by 487
Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings
Gustavsson, L., & Joelsson, A. (2009) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.017 · Cited by 447
Buildings and Climate Change: Status, Challenges and opportunities
Other (2007) · Cited by 371
Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States
Junnila, S., Horvath, A., & Guggemos, A. A. (2006) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12:1(10 · Cited by 343
Self-citationLife Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment
Crawford, R. H. (2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203868171 · Cited by 293
Casals, X. G. (2006) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.05.004 · Cited by 256
Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes
Bilec, M. M., Ries, R. J., Matthews, H. S., & Sharrard, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2006)12:4(207 · Cited by 247
Heinonen, J. T., Jalas, M., Juntunen, J. K., Ala-Mantila, S., & Junnila, S. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025003 · Cited by 207
Self-citationLife‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment
Owens, J. W. (1997) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.37 · Cited by 188
Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., & Ries, R. J. (2008) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2008)14:4(327 · Cited by 162
A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction
Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E. D., Faniran, O. O., & Iyer‐Raniga, U. (2000) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/014461900370898 · Cited by 159
Life cycle inventory of buildings: A calculation method
Verbeeck, G., & Hens, H. (2009) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.10.012 · Cited by 148
Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas
Heinonen, J. T., & Junnila, S. (2011) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014018 · Cited by 142
Self-citationJunnila, S. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0611902 · Cited by 99
Self-citationSustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target
Dutil, Y., Rousse, D. R., & Quesada, G. V. (2011) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su3020443 · Cited by 89
Dense downtown living more carbon intense due to higher consumption: a case study of Helsinki
Heinonen, J. T., Kyrö, R., & Junnila, S. (2011) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034034 · Cited by 81
Self-citationSupply-chain environmental effects of wastewater utilities
Stokes-Draut, J. R., & Horvath, A. (2010) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014015 · Cited by 80
What is the relationship between built form and energy use in dwellings?
Wright, A. J. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.014 · Cited by 78
Kyrö, R., Heinonen, J. T., Säynäjoki, A., & Junnila, S. (2011) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.012 · Cited by 56
Self-citationA Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential Development
Heinonen, J. T., Säynäjoki, A., & Junnila, S. (2011) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su3081170 · Cited by 49
Self-citationRelevance of Emissions Timing in Biofuel Greenhouse Gases and Climate Impacts
Schwietzke, S., Griffin, W. M., & Matthews, H. S. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2016236 · Cited by 38
Carbon Footprint Assessment of a Residential Development Project
Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J. T., & Junnila, S. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Development · doi:10.7763/ijesd.2011.v2.107 · Cited by 26
Self-citationSustainable Buildings in Sustainable Communities: Current State and Future Trends
Huovila, P., Häkkinen, T., Ala-Juusela, M., Koukkari, H., Rissanen, T., & Tuominen, P. (2008) · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy: Version 2 of the Global Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Curve
- 2012, Use and Service Ability of Properties
- Environmental Administration’s Sector Report Environmental Administration’s Reports 19 2008
- 2008, Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) US 2002 Industry Benchmark Model
- Low Energy Constructions
- Heinonen J, 2011, Environ. Res. Lett., 6
- Statistics on the Finances of Housing Corporations
- Kiiras J, 1993, Property maintenance expenses in Finland
- Turning Challenges into Opportunities—A Carbon Neutral Vision for Electricity and District Heat for 2050
- Report Series B
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rissman, J., Bataille, C., Masanet, E., Aden, N., Morrow, W. R., Zhou, N., Elliott, N., Dell, R., Heeren, N., Huckestein, B., et al. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848 · Cited by 1,040
European smart cities: The role of zero energy buildings
Kylili, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2015) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.003 · Cited by 309
Construction sector views on low carbon building materials
Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., & Taylor, P. (2015) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872 · Cited by 287
Onat, N. C., Küçükvar, M., & Tatari, O. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.009 · Cited by 258
Ingrao, C., Messineo, A., Beltramo, R., Yiğitcanlar, T., & Ioppolo, G. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.080 · Cited by 241
Metadata
- Authors
- Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Säynäjoki, Antti
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034037
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081513843
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Keywords
- construction phase emissions, life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, residential buildings, energy efficiency, carbon payback time, building renovation, climate change mitigation, hybrid life cycle assessment, scenario analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
