The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions
Open accessAbstract
While the EU Commission has encouraged Member States to combine national and international climate change mitigation measures with subnational environmental policies, there has been little harmonized effort towards the quantification of embodied greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from household consumption across European regions.This study develops an inventory of carbon footprints associated with household consumption for 177 regions in 27 EU countries, thus, making a key contribution for the incorporation of consumption-based accounting into local decision-making.Footprint calculations are based on consumer expenditure surveys and environmental and trade detail from the EXIOBASE 2.3 multiregional input-output database describing the world economy in 2007 at the detail of 43 countries, 5 rest-of-the-world regions and 200 product sectors.Our analysis highlights the spatial heterogeneity of embodied GHG emissions within multiregional countries with subnational ranges varying widely between 0.6 and 6.5 tCO 2 e/cap.The significant differences in regional contribution in terms of total and per capita emissions suggest notable differences with regards to climate change responsibility.The study further provides a breakdown of regional emissions by consumption categories (e.g.housing, mobility, food).In addition, our region-level study evaluates driving forces of carbon footprints through a set of socio-economic, geographic and technical factors.Income is singled out as the most important driver for a region's carbon footprint, although its explanatory power varies significantly across consumption domains.Additional factors that stand out as important on the regional level include household size, urban-rural typology, level of education, expenditure patterns, temperature, resource availability and carbon intensity of the electricity mix.The lack of cross-national region-level studies has so far prevented analysts from drawing broader policy conclusions that hold beyond national and regional borders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Petersen, M. A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · Cited by 10,746
A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
Colin Cameron, A., & Miller, D. L. (2015) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.50.2.317 · Cited by 5,037
Change, I. P. O. C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416 · Cited by 4,693
(2009) · Cited by 4,453
Carbon Footprint of Nations: A Global, Trade-Linked Analysis
Hertwich, E. G., & Peters, G. P. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es803496a · Cited by 1,715
Self-citationClimate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., & Sokona, Y. (2014) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 1,637
CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
Peters, G. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es072023k · Cited by 1,243
Self-citationEnvironmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption
Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen‐Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2016) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12371 · Cited by 829
Self-citationQuantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint
Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.021 · Cited by 548
INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS
Minx, J. C., Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Peters, G. P., Lenzen, M., Owen, A., Scott, K., Barrett, J., Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., et al. (2009) · Economic Systems Research · doi:10.1080/09535310903541298 · Cited by 542
Self-citation
Cited by
Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Södersten, C., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., Usubiaga, A., Acosta‐Fernández, J., Kuenen, J., Bruckner, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12715 · Cited by 1,024
Self-citationDubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A., Bruyère, S., Andersson, C., Skold, B., Nadaud, F., et al. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001 · Cited by 622
How psychology can help limit climate change.
Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000624 · Cited by 373
The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability
Ivanova, D., & Wood, R. (2020) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2020.12 · Cited by 258
Self-citation(2023) · Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.004 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanova, D., Vita, G., Steen-Olsen, K., Stadler, K., Melo, P. C., Wood, R., & Hertwich, E. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-05-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 054013
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2607149239
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6da9
- The paper
- Ivanova, D., Vita, G., Steen-Olsen, K., Stadler, K., Melo, P. C., Wood, R., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017). Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6da9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.