The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How psychology can help limit climate change.
Open accessAbstract
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has encouraged psychologists to become part of the integrated scientific effort to support the achievement of climate change targets such as keeping within 1.5°C or 2°C of global warming. To date, the typical psychological approach has been to demonstrate that specific concepts and theories can predict behaviors that contribute to or mitigate climate change. Psychologists need to go further and, in particular, show that integrating psychological concepts into feasible interventions can reduce greenhouse gas emissions far more than would be achieved without such integration. While critiquing some aspects of current approaches, we describe psychological research that is pointing the way by distinguishing different types of behavior, acknowledging sociocultural context, and collaborating with other disciplines. Engaging this challenge offers psychologists new opportunities for promoting mitigation, advancing psychological understanding, and developing better interdisciplinary interactions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Self-citationReducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Edenhofer, O., & Seyboth, K. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375067-9.00128-5 · Cited by 3,672
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x · Cited by 3,643
(2019) · Cited by 3,602
Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change
Shove, E. (2010) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a42282 · Cited by 2,439
Some Consequences of Having Too Little
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222426 · Cited by 1,567 · cited 1×
“…executive functions, emotional states, and social environment; Fitzsimons, Finkel, & van Dellen, 2015; Kotabe & Hofmann, 2015) that often interact with constraints due to socioeconomic and time-related factors, as further discussed below (e.g., Farah, 2017; Shah, Mullainathan, & Shafir, 2012).”
BackgroundHousehold actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions
Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908738106 · Cited by 1,450
Self-citationAnalysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change
Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M., & Scarborough, P. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1523119113 · Cited by 1,262
Cited by
Chen, P.-J., & Antonelli, M. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9121898 · Cited by 580
Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve?
Stoddard, I., Anderson, K., Capstick, S., Carton, W., Depledge, J., Facer, K., Gough, C., Hache, F., Hoolohan, C., Hultman, M., et al. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104 · Cited by 574
Self-citationBehaviour change to address climate change
Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., & Capstick, S. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.002 · Cited by 322
Self-citationDirect and mediated impacts of social norms on pro-environmental behavior
Helferich, M., Thøgersen, J., & Bergquist, M. (2023) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102680 · Cited by 191
Cole, J. C., Gillis, A. J., van der Linden, S., Cohen, M. A., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2025) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231186409 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130-144
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W3012632961
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 64.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How psychology can help limit climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/amp0000624
- The paper
- Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
