Cited by 70Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Land speculation and conservation policy leakage in Brazil

Open access
Miranda, Javier, Börner, Jan, Kalkuhl, Matthias, Soares-Filho, Britaldo·2019·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

The Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado biomes have been subject to strong pressure from agricultural expansion over the past two decades. A common claim is that the associated tree cover loss was partly driven by speculative land acquisition. In this paper, we analyze the effects of information on planned road infrastructure improvements and changes in conservation policy implementation on expectations of forest conversion. We use a unique land price dataset covering the period from 2001–2012. Based on land rent and hedonic valuation theory, we argue that forestland prices convey information on expected future land use. We decompose forestland prices into a conventional forestland rent and a speculative part related to forestland conversion and alternative land use rents. Using a fixed-effect panel, we then assess whether, where, and to what extent changes in conservation policy affect forestland prices over time. Our results confirm that forestland prices contain expectations about converting forestland to agricultural or pasture land. We also find indications that the Brazilian land market conveys information about potential conservation policy leakage and explore this conjecture descriptively using dynamic deforestation hotspot maps.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ab003a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Miranda, J., Börner, J., Kalkuhl, M., & Soares-Filho, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Miranda, Javier
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2019-04-02
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
045006
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898107410
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Funders
  • Robert Bosch Stiftung (32.5.8043.0012.0)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031B0019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
land speculation, land rent, hedonic pricing, forest conversion, agricultural expansion, road infrastructure, deforestation, Amazon, Cerrado

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review