The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals
Open accessAbstract
The Paris Agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations Development Programme both entail substantial global investments through cost-efficient, long-term financing. Noted for their risk-alleviating features and appeal to institutional and socially responsible investors, green bonds are gaining prominence in climate change and sustainable development finance frameworks. This study is the first to thoroughly examine publicly reported green bond proceeds allocations from 53 organizations to projects and assets throughout 96 countries from 2008 to 2017. Green bond markets are growing rapidly, and yearly proceeds allocation trends reveal increasing disbursements to renewable energy, clean water, low-carbon transportation, and other Paris Agreement and SDG-related investment categories. Circle plot analysis reveals unique allocation trends to specific green sectors at both regional and national levels. International finance institutions allocated the largest share of proceeds by both frequency and volume, and the projects and assets financed with green bonds in this study sample are associated with over 108 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO 2 e) in greenhouse gas emissions reductions and over 1500 gigawatts in renewable energy capacity. The study concludes with suggestions for improving green bond post-issuance reporting and provides insights for future green bond applications in expanding Paris and SDG agendas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds
Zerbib, O. D. (2019) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.10.012 · Cited by 1,379
Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds
Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25194 · Cited by 493
Cited by
The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis
Saeed Meo, M., & Karim, M. Z. A. (2022) · Borsa Istanbul Review · doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002 · Cited by 599
Bhutta, U. S., Tariq, A., Farrukh, M., Raza, A., & Iqbal, M. K. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121378 · Cited by 517
Does green finance inspire sustainable development? Evidence from a global perspective
Wang, K.-H., Zhao, Y.-X., Jiang, C.-F., & Li, Z.-Z. (2022) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.eap.2022.06.002 · Cited by 361
An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game
Cui, H., Wang, R., & Wang, H. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121799 · Cited by 259
Influence of political leaders on sustainable development goals–insights from twitter
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Gupta, S., & Modgil, S. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2020-0304 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-05-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 064009
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2924583968
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118
- The paper
- Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2019). Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.