Cited by 812Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthClimate Change and Health Impacts

International comparison of health care carbon footprints

Open access
Pichler, Peter-Paul, Jaccard, Ingram S, Weisz, Ulli, Weisz, Helga·2019·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Abstract Climate change confronts the health care sector with a dual challenge. Accumulating climate impacts are putting an increased burden on the service provision of already stressed health care systems in many regions of the world. At the same time, the Paris agreement requires rapid emission reductions in all sectors of the global economy to stay well below the 2 °C target. This study shows that in OECD countries, China, and India, health care on average accounts for 5% of the national CO 2 footprint making the sector comparable in importance to the food sector. Some countries have seen reduced CO 2 emissions related to health care despite growing expenditures since 2000, mirroring their economy wide emission trends. The average per capita health carbon footprint across the country sample in 2014 was 0.6 tCO 2 , varying between 1.51 tCO 2 /cap in the US and 0.06 tCO 2 /cap in India. A statistical analysis shows that the carbon intensity of the domestic energy system, the energy intensity of the domestic economy, and health care expenditure together explain half of the variance in per capita health carbon footprints. Our results indicate that important leverage points exist inside and outside the health sector. We discuss our findings in the context of the existing literature on the potentials and challenges of reducing GHG emissions in the health and energy sector.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The health sector is a main emitter of environmental pollutants that negatively affect health.

    “the sector itself, which aims to protect health, is paradoxically at the same time the main emitter of environmental pollutants that have a negative impact on health itself.”

    From Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Introduction describes health care as a significant source of CO₂ emissions and links climate change to harms to health. The Size and composition section reports that health care accounted for an average of 5.5% of the national carbon footprint in the countries studied. These passages support a substantial contribution, but not the claim that health care is the main emitter of environmental pollutants generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sustainable Development Unit, UK National Health Service 2013 Carbon Footprint update for NHS in England 2012 (Cambridge: Sustainable Development Unit)
  2. Sustainable Development Unit, UK National Health Service 2016 Carbon Footprint Updatefor NHS in England 2015 (Cambridge: Sustainable Development Unit)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pichler, P.-P., Jaccard, I. S., Weisz, U., & Weisz, H.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Association (DE)
  • BOKU University (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Weisz, Ulli
  • Weisz, Helga
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2019-05-24
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
064004
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936403767
Cited by
812
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 182 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 11
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Austrian Climate Research Program (project no GZB670168)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
Keywords
greenhouse gas emissions, health care expenditure, energy intensity, per capita emissions, cross-national comparison, climate change mitigation, Paris Agreement, OECD countries, China, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review