Cited by 37Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Mitigating sustainability tradeoffs as global fruit and vegetable systems expand to meet dietary recommendations

Open access
Stratton, Anne Elise, Finley, John W, Gustafson, David I, Mitcham, Elizabeth J, Myers, Samuel S, Naylor, Rosamond L, Otten, Jennifer J, Palm, Cheryl A·2021·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Recent analyses indicate that global fruit and vegetable (F&V) production will need to increase by 50%–150% by 2050 in order to achieve sustainable and healthy diets for 10 billion people. Although global production of F&V has grown by 50% during the last two decades alone, simply scaling up current systems of F&V production, supply chains, and consumption will inevitably worsen environmental and socioeconomic tradeoffs. This article examines three examples of important F&V—avocados, leafy greens, and tomatoes—to assess the global challenge of meeting dietary recommendations at affordable prices to consumers while sustaining producer livelihoods and minimizing environmental damage. These three cases highlight key characteristics of F&V systems that make the challenge of sustainable expansion especially difficult: knowledge-, input-, and labor-intensive production, high rates of food loss and waste, and low affordability to consumers relative to less nutrient-dense food groups. Our analysis shows that only by investing in innovations that increase diversity, integrate technology, and improve equity will truly sustainable expansion of F&V systems be possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/abe25a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stratton, A. E., Finley, J. W., Gustafson, D. I., Mitcham, E. J., Myers, S. S., Naylor, R. L., Otten, J. J., & Palm, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Stratton, Anne Elise
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2021-05-01
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
055010
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128747239
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2017-68002-26789)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2017‐68002‐26789, -68002-26789)
  • Global Change Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
fruit and vegetable production, sustainable diets, environmental trade-offs, avocado, leafy vegetables, tomato, food loss and waste, food affordability, agricultural innovation, food system equity, dietary recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review