Cited by 3,197Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050

Open access
Parfitt, Julian, Barthel, Mark, Macnaughton, Sarah·2010·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Food waste in the global food supply chain is reviewed in relation to the prospects for feeding a population of nine billion by 2050. Different definitions of food waste with respect to the complexities of food supply chains (FSCs)are discussed. An international literature review found a dearth of data on food waste and estimates varied widely; those for post-harvest losses of grain in developing countries might be overestimated. As much of the post-harvest loss data for developing countries was collected over 30 years ago, current global losses cannot be quantified. A significant gap exists in the understanding of the food waste implications of the rapid development of 'BRIC' economies. The limited data suggest that losses are much higher at the immediate post-harvest stages in developing countries and higher for perishable foods across industrialized and developing economies alike. For affluent economies, post-consumer food waste accounts for the greatest overall losses. To supplement the fragmentary picture and to gain a forward view, interviews were conducted with international FSC experts. The analyses highlighted the scale of the problem, the scope for improved system efficiencies and the challenges of affecting behavioural change to reduce post-consumer waste in affluent populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Baek W. 2009 Change of MSW composition attributed by ban on direct landfill of food waste in Korea. Presentation to the 7th Workshop on GHG Inventories in Asia (WGIA7), 7 July 2009. South Korea: Environmental Management Corporation
  2. Blond R. D. 1984 The agricultural development systems project in Egypt, pp. 42– 48, 190–194 Davis, CA: University of California, Davis
  3. Choudhury M. L. 2006 Recent developments in reducing post-harvest losses in the Asia-Pacific region.. In Reports of the APO Seminar on Reduction of Postharvest Losses of Fruit and Vegetables, October 2004 (ed. Rolle R. S.), pp. 5– 11 Tokyo, Japan: FAO, Asian Productivity Organization (APO)
  4. FAO 1981 Food loss prevention in perishable crops. FAO Agricultural Service Bulletin, no. 43, FAO Statistics Division
  5. Guerra M. Vivas Z. Quintero I. Zambrano de Valera J. 1998 Estudio de las perdidas post-cosecha en nueve rubros horticolas. Proc. Interam. Soc. Trop. Hort. 42, 404– 411
  6. Phan H. H. Nguyen L. H. 1995 Drying research and application in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam. In Proc. of the 17th ASEAN Technical Seminar on Grain Postharvest Technology, July 1995. Lumut, Malaysia
  7. Rolle R. S. (ed.) 2006 Improving postharvest management and marketing in the Asia-Pacific region: issues and challenges trends in the fruit and vegetable sector. Tokyo, Japan: FAO, Asian Productivity Organisation (APO)
  8. Thönissen R. 2009 Food waste: The Netherlands. Presentation to the EU Presidency Climate Smart Food Conf., November 2009, Lund, Sweden
  9. WRAP 2010 A review of waste arisings in the supply of food and drink to UK households. Banbury, UK

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S.
Affiliations
  • Resource Futures, Bristol, UK 1
  • Wrap (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Parfitt, Julian
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-09-27
Volume
365
Issue
1554
Pages
3065-3081
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2138803696
Cited by
3,197
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 229 · 2024: 233 · 2023: 278 · 2022: 286 · 2021: 330 · 2020: 359 · 2019: 310 · 2018: 254 · 2017: 209 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
food waste, food supply chain, post-harvest losses, global food security, developing countries, BRIC countries, behavior change, food loss reduction
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Food Supply, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review