Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia
Open accessAbstract
This study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil’s ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil’s Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17 Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49 Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67 Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35 Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63 Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is widespread non-compliance with environmental legal requirements in Amazonian farms.
“Besides pervasive land tenure insecurity (see Stabile et al., 2020), there is widespread non-compliance with environmental legal requirements in Amazonian farms (Camara et al., 2023).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Camara et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [22][22] Azevedo A A, Raj ˜ ao R, Costa M A, Stabile M C C, Macedo M N, dos Reis T N P, Alencar A, Soares-Filho B S and Pacheco R 2017 Limits of Brazil's Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114 7653-8 -
- [24][24] Rosim S and Rennó C D 2013 TerraHidro: a distributed hydrology modelling system with high quality drainage extraction GEOProcessing 2013 : The 5th Int. Conf. on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications and Services p 7 -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Camara, G., Simoes, R., Ruivo, H. M., Andrade, P. R., Soterroni, A. C., Ramos, F. M., Ramos, R. G., Scarabello, M., Almeida, C., Sanches, I., Maurano, L., Coutinho, A., Esquerdo, J., Antunes, J., Venturieri, A., & Adami, M.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Embrapa (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2023-05-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 065005
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4367836012
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 3.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Climate Initiative, Government of Germany (17-III-084- Global-A-RESTORE+)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101059548)
- Fundo Amazônia (17.2.0536.1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- land tenure, deforestation, forest restoration, Amazon basin, Forest Code, cattle ranching, large landowners, land use, command-and-control policy, market-based policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review