Cited by 13Water resources management and optimizationWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications

Impact of geothermal expansion and lithium extraction in the Salton Sea known geothermal resource area (SS-KGRA) on local water resources

Open access
Busse, Margaret M, McKibben, Michael A, Stringfellow, William, Dobson, Patrick, Stokes-Draut, Jennifer R·2024·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Saline brines currently being brought to the surface to produce geothermal energy in the Salton Sea region of California contain high concentrations of lithium that could potentially be extracted before the brine is reinjected back into the geothermal reservoir. This would create a new supply chain of domestically sourced lithium for the United States to produce lithium-based batteries that will help drive the transition to a renewable-based energy grid. Plans to expand geothermal production along with lithium extraction are being considered in the Salton Sea known geothermal resource area. We discuss water availability and quality issues and potential concerns about water pollution associated with this geothermal expansion and lithium production in the context of potential future restrictions on water extractions from the Colorado River Basin. We estimate that water demand for currently proposed geothermal production and lithium extraction facilities only accounts for ∼4% of the historical water supply in the region. Regional water allocation will be more impacted by the proposed cuts to the region’s water allocation from the Colorado River between now and 2050 than by expansion of geothermal production with associated lithium extraction. Accurately planning for water needs in the future will require more specific information about water demands of the lithium extraction and refining processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ad6a73

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recirculation and purification strategies result in a modeled overall water demand of 357 kg/kg Li2CO3 at Salton Sea, comparable with the reported range of 200-600 kg/kg Li2CO3 from companies operating there.

    “In the specific context of water use, recirculation and purification strategies result in a modeled overall water demand (357 kg/kg Li2CO3) which is comparable with the reported range (200–600 kg/kg Li2CO3) from companies operating at Salton Sea.84”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Busse, M. M., McKibben, M. A., Stringfellow, W., Dobson, P., & Stokes-Draut, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-09-06
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
104011
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401241878
Cited by
13
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Geothermal Technologies Office (DE-AC02–05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Keywords
lithium recovery, Salton Sea, saline brines, water resources, water quality, water pollution, Colorado River Basin, water allocation, lithium supply chain, lithium batteries, water demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review