The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lower and upper bounds on CSL parameters from latent image formation and IGM heating
Open accessAbstract
We study lower and upper bounds on the parameters for stochastic state vector reduction, focusing on the mass-proportional continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model. We show that the assumption that the state vector is reduced whan a latent image is formed, in photography or etched track detection, requires a CSL rate parameter $\lambda$ that is larger than conventionally assumed by a factor of roughly $2 \times 10^{9\pm 2}$, for a correlation length $r_C$ of $10^{-5}{\rm cm}$. We reanalyze existing upper bounds on the reduction rate and conclude that all are compatible with such an increase in $\lambda$. The best bounds that we have obtained come from a consideration of heating of the intergalactic medium (IGM), which shows that $\lambda$ can be at most $\sim 10^{8\pm 1}$ times as large as the standard CSL value, again for $r_C=10^{-5} {\rm cm}$. (For both the lower and upper bounds, quoted errors are not purely statistical errors, but rather are estimates reflecting modeling uncertainties.) We discuss modifications in our analysis corresponding to a larger value of $r_C$. With a substantially enlarged rate parameter, CSL effects may be within range of experimental detection (or refutation) with current technologies. ADDED NOTE: A careful calculation of radiation from atomic systems in the CSL model (Adler and Ramazanoglu, arXiv:0707.3134) has reinstated the bound obtained by Fu as the best upper bound on lambda, with significant implications for CSL model phenomenology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment
Joos, E., & Zeh, H. D. (1985) · Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1007/bf01725541 · Cited by 1,505
Bassi, A., & Ghirardi, G. (2003) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00103-0 · Cited by 725
Cited by
Models of wave-function collapse, underlying theories, and experimental tests
Bassi, A., Lochan, K., Satin, S., Singh, T. P., & Ulbricht, H. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.471 · Cited by 1,170
Quantum superposition of molecules beyond 25 kDa
Fein, Y. Y., Geyer, P., Zwick, P., Kiałka, F., Pedalino, S., Mayor, M., Gerlich, S., & Arndt, M. (2019) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0663-9 · Cited by 353
Present status and future challenges of non-interferometric tests of collapse models
Carlesso, M., Donadi, S., Ferialdi, L., Paternostro, M., Ulbricht, H., & Bassi, A. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5 · Cited by 136
Quantum theory and determinism
Vaidman, L. (2014) · Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-014-0008-4 · Cited by 65
Diffeomorphism invariant classical-quantum path integrals for Nordström gravity
Oppenheim, J., Russo, A., & Weller-Davies, Z. (2024) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.024007 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Adler, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-03-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2935-2957
- ISSN
- 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-8121
- OpenAlex
- W2034927926
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lower and upper bounds on CSL parameters from latent image formation and IGM heating. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1751-8113/40/12/s03
- The paper
- Adler, S. L. (2007). Lower and upper bounds on CSL parameters from latent image formation and IGM heating. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/12/s03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.