Cited by 29ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactDigital Transformation in IndustryFlexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

A methodology for Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) implementation

Open access
Govindaraju, Rajesri, Putra, Krisna·2016·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract

Manufacturing execution system is information systems (IS) application that bridges the gap between IS at the top level, namely enterprise resource planning (ERP), and IS at the lower levels, namely the automation systems. MES provides a media for optimizing the manufacturing process as a whole in a real time basis. By the use of MES in combination with the implementation of ERP and other automation systems, a manufacturing company is expected to have high competitiveness. In implementing MES, functional integration -making all the components of the manufacturing system able to work well together, is the most difficult challenge. For this, there has been an industry standard that specifies the sub-systems of a manufacturing execution systems and defines the boundaries between ERP systems, MES, and other automation systems. The standard is known as ISA-95. Although the advantages from the use of MES have been stated in some studies, not much research being done on how to implement MES effectively. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology describing how MES implementation project should be managed, utilising the support of ISA- 95 reference model in the system development process. A proposed methodology was developed based on a general IS development methodology. The developed methodology were then revisited based on the understanding about the specific charateristics of MES implementation project found in an Indonesian steel manufacturing company implementation case. The case study highlighted the importance of applying an effective requirement elicitation method during innitial system assessment process, managing system interfaces and labor division in the design process, and performing a pilot deployment before putting the whole system into operation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012094

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital twins identify the design for automated flow-shop manufacturing systems.

    “identifying the design for automated flow-shop manufacturing systems [24]”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe designing and implementing manufacturing execution systems, including their interfaces with automation systems. Our copy does not address digital twins identifying designs for automated flow-shop systems; searches for digital twins and flow-shop design found no passage making that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In most reviewed cases, DT are developed on a single scope level.

    “but in most of the cases DT are usually developed on a single scope level, i.e. [24,30,31].”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

    The implementation-scope discussion (Section 2.2; page not provided) describes levels in an MES system hierarchy, not the scope of digital twins. Searches for digital twins, DT, and single-scope-level development found no passage addressing whether most reviewed cases use one scope level. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Deuel A 1994 The benefits of a manufacturing execution system for plantwide automation ISA Transactions 113-124
  2. Fuchs F and Thiel K 2009 Manufacturing Execution Systems: Optimal Design, Planning, and Deployment (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  3. Hadjimichael B 2004 Manufacturing Execution Systems Integration and Intelligence (Master Thesis McGill University)
  4. Cao W Jing S and Wang X 2008 Research on Manufacturing Execution System for Cement Industry IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications 1614-1618
  5. Waldron T A 2011 Strategic Development of a Manufacturing Execution System (MES) for Cold Chain Management Using Information Product Mapping (Master Thesis - Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
  6. Pressman R 2010 Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach 7th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  7. Markus L M 2004 Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change, Journal of Informaiton Technology 19(1) 3-19
  8. Meyer H Fuchs F and Thiel K 2009 Manufacturing Execution Systems: Optimal design, planning and deployment (New York: McGraw-Hill)
  9. Joshi M M Nagare M R 2014 Implementing Manufacturing Execution Systems through Lean Manufacturing Approach, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| 2(4) 337-340
  10. iMEC-APCOMS 2015 IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 114 (2016) 012094 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012094

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Govindaraju, R., & Putra, K.
Affiliations
Bandung Institute of Technology (ID)
Corresponding author
Govindaraju, Rajesri
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2016-02
Volume
114
Pages
012094
ISSN
  • 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-899X
OpenAlex
W2314411933
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.74
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
Keywords
manufacturing execution system, MES implementation, implementation methodology, enterprise resource planning, functional integration, requirement elicitation, system interfaces, pilot implementation, steel industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review