Kanban Systems in the Context of the Enterprise Systems
Open accessAbstract
Companies are under increasing pressure from customers, competitors, limited resources, etc. These conditions oblige companies to permanently improve their organizational structure and the activities of all system’s flows. The paper analyses the types of Kanban systems, in the broader context of the enterprise systems. The most important reference architectures were analysed (with the emphasis on the modules dedicated to flow description) and the standards that allow the activity modelling of a manufacturing enterprises. Starting from this context, the paper describes three models of Kanban systems that are specific to companies with different information systems development. Models are: Push production with withdrawal Kanban; Pull production with withdrawal Kanban and production Kanban triggered by Kanban board; Pull production with withdrawal Kanban and production Kanban triggered by the dispatch to the customers. The models are graphically described using Value Stream Map (VMS) symbols. These models are useful in the development and improvement of production flows.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
El sistema Kanban es una de las metodologías y herramientas innovadoras que permiten mejoras dentro de una organización para competir en el mercado.
“Como solución a la busca de un aumento en la productividad surgen metodologías y herramientas innovadoras que permiten mejoras dentro de una organización para poder competir en el mercado, una de estas metodologías es el sistema Kanban [6], [7].”
From Integración del IoT a un sistema Kanban para el ensamble de elementos plásticos (2026) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Chen, D., Vallespir, B., & Doumeingts, G. (1997) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/s0166-3615(97)00043-2 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Krishnamurthy, A., Suri, R., & Vernon, M. K. (2004) · International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1023/b:flex.0000044837.86194.19 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Buffer sizing of a Heijunka Kanban system
Matzka, J., Mascolo, M. D., & Furmans, K. (2009) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0317-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Enterprise modelling techniques to improve efficiency of enterprises
Doumeingts, G., & Ducq, Y. (2001) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537280150501257 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Mighty MESs; state-of-the-art and future manufacturing execution systems
Qiu, R. G., & Zhou, M. (2004) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2004.1275947 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
A methodology for Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) implementation
Govindaraju, R., & Putra, K. (2016) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/114/1/012094 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Comparative study of open IoT architectures with TOGAF for industry implementation
Camatti, J. A., Rabelo, G. M., Borsato, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.159 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Formalizing ISA-95 level 3 control with smart manufacturing system models
McGinnis, L. F. (2019) · doi:10.6028/nist.gcr.19-022 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Lundius, A. (2019) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- E. Latiffianti, N. Siswanto, S. E. Wiratno, Y. A. Saputra, AIP Conference Proceedings 1902, 020040 (2017).
- T.Williams, Computers in Industry, 24, Issues 2-3, 41 (1994)
- D. Chen, B. Vallespir, G. Doumeingts, Computers in Industry, 33, Issues 2-3, 387 (1997)
- G. Doumeingts &Y. Ducq, Production Planning & Control , The Management of Operations, 12, Issue 2, 14 (2001)
- P. Bernus, O. Noran, A.Molina, Enterprise Architecture: Twenty Years of the GERAM Framework, Annual Reviews in Control, 39, 83 (2015)
- J.A.Camatti, G.M. Rabelo, M Borsato, Procedia Manufacturing 51, 1132 (2020)
- R. Qiu, M. Zhou, Engineering, Computer Science, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 11, 19 (2004)
- R. Govindaraju, K. Putra iMEC-APCOMS, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 114 (2016)
- M. Apreutesei, E. Suciu, I.R. Arvinte, Analele Universitatii "Eftimie Murgu" Resita, Year XVII, 2, 23 (2010)
- A. Krishnamurthy, R. Suri, M. Vernon, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 16, 123 (2004)
- J. Matzka, • M. Di Mascolo • K. Furmans, J. Intell. Manuf., 23, 49 (2012)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integración del IoT a un sistema Kanban para el ensamble de elementos plásticos
Ovalle Castiblanco, A. M., Vargas Sanchez, C. A., & Buriticá Rodriguez, J. E. (2026) · Ingeniería y Desarrollo · doi:10.14482/inde.44.01.632.655
Execution of Pull System and Constant Work-in-Process Using Kanban System—A Case Study
Ukey, K., Gajghate, S. S., Kumar, S., Behera, A. K., & Majumder, H. (2025) · doi:10.3390/engproc2025114002
- Authors
- Beju, L. D., & Legutko, S.
- Affiliations
- Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu (RO)
- Venue
- MATEC Web of Conferences
- Publisher
- EDP Sciences
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 343
- Pages
- 03001
- ISSN
- 2261-236X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3189287247
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- MATEC Web of Conferences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- Kanban, enterprise systems, push production, pull production, Kanban board, value stream mapping, reference architecture, production flow improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
