Improving Social Responsibility of Artificial Intelligence by Using ISO 26000
Open accessAbstract
The vigorous development of artificial intelligence has had a profound and long-term impact on human production and life. It is a double-edged sword. While letting people enjoy the good life created by new technology, it also allows people to feel its negative effects, such as infringing on human privacy, and bringing new inequalities to human beings. Discussing the social responsibility of artificial intelligence has become a hot topic in academic circles in the past two years. This article starts with adopting the research framework of ISO 26000, comprehensively analyzing the problems of artificial intelligence social responsibility in theory and practice, and putting forward their own thinking. It is concluded that in the age of artificial intelligence, we will proceed from the seven themes of this standard to enhance the social responsibility of artificial intelligence, and ultimately achieve the sustainable development of artificial intelligence by adopting the social responsibility international standard ISO 26000,.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As the societal use of and dependency on AI and ML increases, it is crucial to identify what needs exist from a regulatory perspective.
“As the societal use of and dependency on AI and ML increases, it is crucial to identify what needs exist from a regulatory perspective.158”
From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [158]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age
Mason, R. O., Collins, C. P., & Cox, E. L. (1986) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248873 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
Guidance on social responsibility
(2010) · doi:10.5555/iso26000:2010 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond
Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2019) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0781-9 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Preserving Privacy as Social Responsibility in Online Social Networks
Keküllüoğlu, D., Kökciyan, N., & Yolum, P. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · doi:10.1145/3158373 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From ethical AI frameworks to tools: a review of approaches
Prem, E. (2023) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00258-9 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions
Zhao, J., & Gómez Fariñas, B. (2023) · European Business Organization Law Review · doi:10.1007/s40804-022-00262-2 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Chang, Y.-L., & Ke, J. (2023) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843231200930 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Explaining the Principles to Practices Gap in AI
Schiff, D. S., Rakova, B., Ayesh, A., Fanti, A., & Lennon, M. (2021) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mts.2021.3056286 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Building Trustworthy AI Solutions: A Case for Practical Solutions for Small Businesses
Crockett, K. A., Colyer, E., Gerber, L., & Latham, A. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2021.3137091 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Bhat, M. A., Bhat, M. A., Jan, S., Shah, A. A., & Jan, A. T. (2024) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107349 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Empowerment or Engagement? Digital Health Technologies for Mental Healthcare
Burr, C., & Morley, J. (2020) · Digital ethics lab yearbook · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29145-7_5 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework to Predict Operational Excellence: UAE Case Study
Hassan, R. R., Talib, M. W. A., Dweiri, F. T., & Román, J. J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14062569 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
AI and Learning Systems - Industrial Applications and Future Directions
Kyprianidis, K., & Dahlquist, E. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.85833 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Futures
Samanvitha, C., Dharmendra, H., Nethravathi, N., & Velmurugan, P. R. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5380-6.ch006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Fethallah, W., Chraïbi, L., & Sefiani, N. (2021) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2021.1974828 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Handover Delay Analysis on Cellular Communication for Connected Car Application in Urban Area
Hamid, A. F. A., Rahman, M. T. A., Rahman, A., & Tan, Z. A. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/551/1/012022 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Building a Self-Sustaining World
Samuel, P., Reshmy, A. K., Rajesh, S., & Karthika, R. A. (2024) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-1702-0.ch005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Socially Responsible Application of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management
Gričnik, A. M., Mulej, M., & Žižek, S. Š. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3334-1.ch004 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Social Responsibility
Krkač, K., & Bračević, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42465-7_41 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yurdasever, E. (2026) · İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.17336/igusbd.1641462 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and ISO 26000 (Guidance on Social Responsibility)
Zhao, W. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.93451 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationRouhana, R., Sayegh, M. M., & Sidani, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66431-1_8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Особливості використання штучного інтелекту в Україні: нормативний аспект
Рябчиков, О. М. (2024) · Adaptive Management Theory and Practice Economics · doi:10.33296/2707-0654-18(36)-03
Boubaa, A., Bedj, T. B., & Smaali, D. (2024) · Brazilian Journal of Business · doi:10.34140/bjbv6n4-060
Evaluation of AI ethics tools in language models: a developers' perspective case study
Silva, J., Moreira, D. A. B., dos Santos, G. D., Ferreira, A. I., Maia, H. A., Avila, S., & Pedrini, H. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00914-2
Dashti, E. A., & Rostamzadeh, R. (2026) · Transformations and Sustainability · doi:10.63775/xpw9v151
Marwala, T. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36322-1.00015-8
- Authors
- Zhao, W.-W.
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-10-01
- Volume
- 428
- Pages
- 012049
- ISSN
- 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-899X
- OpenAlex
- W2895020971
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, social responsibility, ISO 26000, corporate social responsibility, privacy violations, inequality, sustainable development, international standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
