The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanostructured Pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting
Open accessAbstract
Bioprinting is an emerging technology in the field of tissue engineering as it allows the precise positioning of biologically relevant materials in 3D, which more resembles the native tissue in our body than current homogenous, bulk approaches. There is however a lack of materials to be used with this technology and materials such as the block copolymer Pluronic have good printing properties but do not allow long-term cell culture. Here we present an approach called nanostructuring to increase the biocompatibility of Pluronic gels at printable concentrations. By mixing acrylated with unmodified Pluronic F127 it was possible to maintain the excellent printing properties of Pluronic and to create stable gels via UV crosslinking. By subsequent elution of the unmodified Pluronic from the crosslinked network we were able to increase the cell viability of encapsulated chondrocytes at day 14 from 62% for a pure acrylated Pluronic hydrogel to 86% for a nanostructured hydrogel. The mixed Pluronic gels also showed good printability when cells where included in the bioink. The nanostructured gels were, with a compressive modulus of 1.42 kPa, mechanically weak, but we were able to increase the mechanical properties by the addition of methacrylated hyaluronic acid. Our nanostructuring approach enables Pluronic hydrogels to have the desired set of properties in all stages of the bioprinting process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Billiet, T., Gevaert, E., De Schryver, T., Cornelissen, M., & Dubruel, P. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 · Cited by 1,015
Bryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Cited by
Printability and shape fidelity of bioinks in 3D bioprinting
Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., & Malda, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 · Cited by 1,359
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs
Ashammakhi, N., Ahadian, S., Xu, C., Montazerian, H., Ko, H., Nasiri, R., Barros, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2019) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100008 · Cited by 549
Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability
Gillispie, G., Prim, P., Copus, J., Fisher, J., Mikos, A. G., Yoo, J. J., Atala, A., & Lee, S. J. (2020) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d · Cited by 426
Poloxamer: A versatile tri-block copolymer for biomedical applications
Zarrintaj, P., Ramsey, J. D., Samadi, A., Atoufi, Z., Yazdi, M. K., Ganjali, M. R., Amirabad, L. M., Zangene, E., Farokhi, M., Formela, K., et al. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.028 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, M., Becher, J., Schnabelrauch, M., & Zenobi-Wong, M.
- Venue
- Biofabrication
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 035006
- ISSN
- 1758-5082 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5090
- OpenAlex
- W1544137929
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanostructured Pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006
- The paper
- Müller, M., Becher, J., Schnabelrauch, M., & Zenobi-Wong, M. (2015). Nanostructured Pluronic hydrogels as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.