The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EVOLUTION OF GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS, MASS DENSITIES, AND MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIOS FROM z ∼ 7 TO z ∼ 4
Open accessAbstract
We derive stellar masses from spectral energy distribution fitting to rest-frame optical and UV fluxes for 401 star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 4, 5, and 6 from Hubble-WFC3/IR camera observations of the Early Release Science field combined with the deep GOODS-S Spitzer /IRAC data (and include a previously published z ∼ 7 sample). A mass–luminosity relation with strongly luminosity-dependent ratios is found for the largest sample (299 galaxies) at z ∼ 4. The relation has a well-determined intrinsic sample variance of 0.5 dex. This relation is also consistent with the more limited samples at z ∼ 5–7. This z ∼ 4 mass–luminosity relation, and the well-established faint UV-luminosity functions at z ∼ 4–7, are used to derive galaxy mass functions (MFs) to masses at z ∼ 4–7. A bootstrap approach is used to derive the MFs to account for the large scatter in the relation and the luminosity function uncertainties, along with an analytical cross-check. The MFs are also corrected for the effects of incompleteness. The incompleteness-corrected MFs are steeper than previously found, with slopes α M ∼ −1.4 to −1.6 at low masses. These slopes are, however, still substantially flatter than the MFs obtained from recent hydrodynamical simulations. We use these MFs to estimate the stellar mass density (SMD) of the universe to a fixed M UV, AB < − 18 as a function of redshift and find an SMD growth ∝(1 + z ) −3.4 ± 0.8 from z ∼ 7 to z ∼ 4. We also derive the SMD from the completeness-corrected MFs to a mass limit M ☉ . Such completeness-corrected MFs and the derived SMDs will be particularly important for comparisons as future MFs reach to lower masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
A HIGHLY CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE STAR-FORMING “MAIN SEQUENCE” FROM z ∼ 0-6
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 · Cited by 1,646
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 · Cited by 1,243
MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. I. SIZE EVOLUTION
Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15 · Cited by 426
Evolution of galaxy stellar masses and star formation rates in the eagle simulations
Furlong, M., Bower, R. G., Theuns, T., Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Schaller, M., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv852 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- González, V., Labbé, I., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G., Franx, M., & Kriek, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-06-21
- Volume
- 735
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L34
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W2952765182
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EVOLUTION OF GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS, MASS DENSITIES, AND MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIOS FROM z ∼ 7 TO z ∼ 4. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/l34
- The paper
- González, V., Labbé, I., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G., Franx, M., & Kriek, M. (2011). EVOLUTION OF GALAXY STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS, MASS DENSITIES, AND MASS-TO-LIGHT RATIOS FROM z ∼ 7 TO z ∼ 4. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/735/2/l34
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.