Cited by 23Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

IDENTIFYING THE RADIO BUBBLE NATURE OF THE MICROWAVE HAZE

Open access
Dobler, Gregory·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Using seven-year data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe , I identify a sharp "edge" in the microwave haze at high southern Galactic latitude (−55° < b < −35°) that is spatially coincident with the southern edge of the " Fermi haze/bubbles." This finding proves conclusively that the edge in the gamma rays is real (and not a processing artifact), demonstrates explicitly that the microwave haze and the gamma-ray bubbles are indeed the same structure observed at multiple wavelengths, and strongly supports the interpretation of the microwave haze as a separate component of Galactic synchrotron (likely generated by a transient event) as opposed to a simple variation of the spectral index of disk synchrotron. In addition, combining these data sets allows for the first determination of the magnetic field within a radio bubble using microwaves and gamma rays by taking advantage of the fact that the inverse Compton gamma rays are primarily generated by scattering of cosmic microwave background photons at these latitudes, thus minimizing uncertainty in the target radiation field. Assuming uniform volume emissivity, I find that the magnetic field within the southern Galactic microwave/gamma-ray bubble is ∼5 μG above 6 kpc off of the Galactic plane.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/760/1/l8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The typical magnetic field in the haze is B ∼ 8 μG.

    “Further analysis of the microwave spectrum showed that the typical magnetic field in the haze is, B ∼ 8 µ G (Su et al. 2010; Dobler 2012; Ackermann et al. 2014; Narayanan &amp; Slatyer 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobler, G.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Dobler, Gregory
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-11-01
Volume
760
Issue
1
Pages
L8
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2110678165
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Fermi bubbles, Galactic synchrotron emission, radio bubbles, inverse Compton scattering, cosmic microwave background, galactic magnetic fields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review