IDENTIFYING THE RADIO BUBBLE NATURE OF THE MICROWAVE HAZE
Open accessAbstract
Using seven-year data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe , I identify a sharp "edge" in the microwave haze at high southern Galactic latitude (−55° < b < −35°) that is spatially coincident with the southern edge of the " Fermi haze/bubbles." This finding proves conclusively that the edge in the gamma rays is real (and not a processing artifact), demonstrates explicitly that the microwave haze and the gamma-ray bubbles are indeed the same structure observed at multiple wavelengths, and strongly supports the interpretation of the microwave haze as a separate component of Galactic synchrotron (likely generated by a transient event) as opposed to a simple variation of the spectral index of disk synchrotron. In addition, combining these data sets allows for the first determination of the magnetic field within a radio bubble using microwaves and gamma rays by taking advantage of the fact that the inverse Compton gamma rays are primarily generated by scattering of cosmic microwave background photons at these latitudes, thus minimizing uncertainty in the target radiation field. Assuming uniform volume emissivity, I find that the magnetic field within the southern Galactic microwave/gamma-ray bubble is ∼5 μG above 6 kpc off of the Galactic plane.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The typical magnetic field in the haze is B ∼ 8 μG.
“Further analysis of the microwave spectrum showed that the typical magnetic field in the haze is, B ∼ 8 µ G (Su et al. 2010; Dobler 2012; Ackermann et al. 2014; Narayanan & Slatyer 2017).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Dobler 2012
Cites
Microwave Interstellar Medium Emission Observed by the<i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe</i>
Finkbeiner, D. P. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423482 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
THE<i>FERMI</i>HAZE: A GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO THE MICROWAVE HAZE
Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D. P., Cholis, I., Slatyer, T., & Weiner, N. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/825 · Cited by 285 · cited 10× · see citing works
“It is interesting to note that this spectrum of the “cap” of the bubble is somewhat softer than that found by Dobler et al. (2010) and Su et al. (2010) who include lower latitudes, in agreement with the IC scenario (since the higher energy optical and IR components of the ISRF have lower amplitude…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationFermi Bubbles: Giant, Multibillion-Year-Old Reservoirs of Galactic Center Cosmic Rays
Crocker, R. M., & Aharonian, F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.101102 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Extended Anomalous Foreground Emission in the<i>WMAP</i>Three‐Year Data
Dobler, G., & Finkbeiner, D. P. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/587862 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationFermi Gamma-Ray “Bubbles” from Stochastic Acceleration of Electrons
Mertsch, P., & Sarkar, S. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.091101 · Cited by 119 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…roughly a powerlaw from ∼1-1000 GeV suggesting that either the electrons have not had sufficient time to cool (the cooling time in this energy range is ∼ 106-107 yr; see Su et al. 2010) or are continuously being accelerated within the haze/bubbles (e.g., Dobler et al. 2011; Mertsch & Sarkar 2011).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crocker, R. M., Bicknell, G. V., Taylor, A. M., & Carretti, E. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/107 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The Fermi bubbles: gamma-ray, microwave and polarization signatures of leptonic AGN jets
Yang, H.-Y. K., Ruszkowski, M., & Zweibel, E. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1772 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way
Sarkar, K. C. (2024) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-024-00152-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dobler, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dobler, Gregory
- ORCID
- Dobler, Gregory
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- Volume
- 760
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L8
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W2110678165
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- Fermi bubbles, Galactic synchrotron emission, radio bubbles, inverse Compton scattering, cosmic microwave background, galactic magnetic fields
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review