Cited by 285Astrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

THE FERMI HAZE: A GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO THE MICROWAVE HAZE

Open access
Dobler, Gregory, Finkbeiner, Douglas P., Cholis, Ilias, Slatyer, Tracy, Weiner, Neal·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope reveals a diffuse inverse Compton (IC) signal in the inner Galaxy with a similar spatial morphology to the microwave haze observed by WMAP, supporting the synchrotron interpretation of the microwave signal. Using spatial templates, we regress out π 0 gammas, as well as IC and bremsstrahlung components associated with known soft-synchrotron counterparts. We find a significant gamma-ray excess toward the Galactic center with a spectrum that is significantly harder than other sky components and is most consistent with IC from a hard population of electrons. The morphology and spectrum are consistent with it being the IC counterpart to the electrons which generate the microwave haze seen at WMAP frequencies. In addition, the implied electron spectrum is hard; electrons accelerated in supernova shocks in the disk which then diffuse a few kpc to the haze region would have a softer spectrum. We describe the full-sky Fermi maps used in this analysis and make them available for download.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/825

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a large-scale outflow from the center of the Milky Way was confirmed after the discovery of two large (~8-10 kpc) gamma-ray bubbles using the Fermi-LAT telescope.

    “The presence of a large-scale outflow from the center of our own Galaxy was confirmed after the discovery of two large ( ∼ 8 -10 kpc) γ -ray bubbles using the Fermi-LAT telescope.”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Dobler et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D. P., Cholis, I., Slatyer, T., & Weiner, N.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Dobler, Gregory
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-06-18
Volume
717
Issue
2
Pages
825-842
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1980231566
Cited by
285
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 32
FWCI
17.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, inverse Compton scattering, Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, synchrotron radiation, electron energy spectrum, bremsstrahlung, diffuse gamma-ray emission, inner Galaxy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review