Cited by 16Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

Decoherence of up to 8-qubit entangled states in a 16-qubit superconducting quantum processor

Open access
Ozaeta, Asier, McMahon, Peter L·2019·Quantum Science and Technology

Abstract

We report on the coherence of Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger (GHZ) states comprised of up to 8 qubits in the IBM ibmqx5 16-qubit quantum processor. In particular, we evaluate the coherence of GHZ states with N = 1, …, 8 qubits 4 , as a function of a delay time between state creation and measurement. We find that the decay in coherence occurs at a rate that is linear in the number of qubits. This is consistent with a model in which the dominant noise affecting the system is uncorrelated across qubits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2058-9565/ab13e5

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Martinis J 2017 Quantum supremacy: checking a quantum computer with a classical supercomputer Bulletin of the American Physical Society vol 62 (New Orleans, LA: American Physical Society)
  2. Greenberger D M, Horne M A and Zeilinger A 1989 Going beyond Bellʼs theorem Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe, Fundamental Theories of Physics (Dordrecht: Springer) pp 69-72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozaeta, A., & McMahon, P. L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Ozaeta, Asier
Venue
Quantum Science and Technology
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
025015
ISSN
2058-9565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2779862608
Cited by
16
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quantum Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
decoherence, GHZ states, entangled states, superconducting qubits, IBM Quantum Experience, qubit number scaling, uncorrelated noise, multiqubit entanglement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review